light. Please review.

[syamantak]

One subject I really like. But I don't know if I can work with it properly. Help!


1.
View attachment 17441


2.
View attachment 17436


3.
View attachment 17434


4.
View attachment 17435


5.
View attachment 17437


6.
View attachment 17438


7.
View attachment 17439


8.
View attachment 17440


9.
View attachment 17433

 

[MLeeK]

You post way to many photos to give you good CC.

 

[Atari1977]

#1: Underexposed, I think you we're trying to go for a silhouette but it doesn't really work when I can't see the rest of the building. Also it kind of looks crooked, that may be your framing or the kind of thing tilt-shift lenses are built for.
#2: Underexposed
#3:Good silhouette, just not a very interesting subject
#4:This ones actually pretty good \
#5: I just don't think it's a good subject, might be better if the whole wall was lit up
#6: Looks a bit like a snap shot, not an interesting subject. Also it's incredibly warm, do you know what white balance is?
#7:This kind of shot really needs a graduated density filter so that you don't underexpose the ground. Also sky is underexposed
#8:Blurry, up the ISO

 

[syamantak]

alright, will try to post less photos. and thanks for the critique.