invisible
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2007
- Messages
- 5,213
- Reaction score
- 983
- Location
- Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Thread Starter 🔹
- #16
Thanks, John! The camera didn't really make a difference, but the lens (Tokina 11-16) did.Amazing pictures what camera where you using for those pictures?
Thanks, Michael. Since this place has a natural beauty that is beyond belief, for these photos I decided not to crank the saturation at all. I wanted the photos to show the lake exactly as I saw it. But I agree, a bit more saturation would make this one pop.great pictures, i love the first one, i'd like to see a bit more saturation but that's just a personal preference
I actually made a conscious effort to include the shadow of the tree branch as some sort of frame AND leading line. I know it's a matter of taste, and I like it as is... to the point that the title of this photo is "In the shade"in the second one that's really cool too. the only distraction i see is the shadow of the tree branch.. but that's the problem of shooting in the regular daytime, can't get around the rules of nature

While I'm honoured that you liked this one well enough to make it your background, I can't say I'm happy.The first one is mind blowing, it also happens to be my new background. Thank you very much!!
Thanks everybody for your kind comments!