I like it Rotanimod, but I like the original better. My only regret on mine is framing too tight.
When I took the shot, I was drawn by the solitude of the building as well as the fire escapes and windows.
I lose some of that with a crop like yours, but I understand why you want to focus on the parts rather than the whole.
I also get why my framing might fall short of my goal.
Thanks for the taking the time. Much appreciated.
I probably wouldn't have bothered with the shot in the first place if I didn't like it a lot. Or at least some part of it a lot. I want to explain the reasons for the crop a bit more.
A. The eye first travels to the ladder, and naturally follows its way out of the frame. It carries you through the frame in a zig-zag motion, and brings you past a variety of interesting windows. The crop at the bottom margin allows the imagination to fill in how tall the building is. There isn't any visual clue to how long it will continue to go.
B. A nice roof edge to break up the repetitive patterns of the windows/fire escapes and give the ladder some dominant visual space.
As you travel down the frame you encounter:
C. Partially opened window-- visually interesting
D. Opened curtains, nice contrast and mystery -- A bit Hitchcock "Rear Window"
E. Nice shadows by the opened window
The tight left and right margins, indicated by arrow, bring symmetry and balance and allow the viewer to "fill in the blanks" on the margins.
This crop, to me, is more symbolic and more about shape/pattern/repetition and suggestion versus a shot of an identifiable building.
I imagine a large version of this would present nicely in a coffee shop. There's enough visually interesting elements for the eye to explore, while there's enough left to the imagination.
I believe your original shot has some things working against it. Namely, the visual clutter around the bottom, bottom left, and right frame. The top of the roof being lop-sided and the tree are too much of a counter-balance to an otherwise symmetrical urban study.