Pretty Beaver

[Sebastian_Riel]

For fun. 60ft above the beaver with a 7-3 @ 300mm.

 

[CMfromIL]

Obligitory "Nice Beaver" comment. :lmao:

 

[Jaemie]

Wet beaver

1) Is the photo grainy or OOF or is that just the water? It's hard to see; I wish there was a larger version.
2) Your signature is stealing the show.

 

[HughGuessWho132 47]

Teaser

 

[gsgary]

Not the beaver i was hoping for

 

[Sebastian_Riel]

@ CMfromIL: Hehe

Wet beaver 1) Is the photo grainy or OOF or is that just the water? It's hard to see; I wish there was a larger version. 2) Your signature is stealing the show.

Shot at iso 2500. What does "OOF" stand for ?

 

[Jaemie]

@ CMfromIL: Hehe

Wet beaver 1) Is the photo grainy or OOF or is that just the water? It's hard to see; I wish there was a larger version. 2) Your signature is stealing the show.

Shot at iso 2500. What does "OOF" stand for ?

OOF = out of focus

Why the high ISO?

 

[Joel_W]

Unfortunately, nothing really exciting about your composition. Just a Beaver swimming in the water. No need for that high ISO. Your watermark is way too big and bright. As I've said over and over again, there is absolutely no need for one, but if you must have one, make it smaller, a neutral color, and placed in the corner furthest from the subject.

 

[Demers18]

I agree Joel here. Why is your ISO so high? Were you shooting in auto? Were you using a tripod?

It could OOF because of camera shake if you weren't using a tripod.

 

[Sebastian_Riel]

I said for fun in the beginning of my post. I'm not looking for a national geographic award here haha. @ Jaemie it was 5:20am and the zoom was fully extended; and I was shooting with one hand; but the quality of the image is due to "lens diffraction" ? @ the 300mm mark ? I can't get sharp images with that lense unless the subject is human and is 10 feet away. Images are only sharp with that lens @ 70-180mm.

 

[Patriot]

Cool beaver man. I like it

 

[Sebastian_Riel]

Cool beaver man. I like it

Thanks hehe