NateS
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2007
- Messages
- 2,750
- Reaction score
- 39
- Location
- Missouri
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
So you take one of Nikon's weakest lenses (the non-vr 70-300) and put it against one of Sigma's sharpest lenses (the Sigma 105 macro). What did you expect. Go get a Sigma 70-300 non-apo and put it against a Nikon 300mm f2.8 and see what the results are. The results will be you find that you have an apple and an orange...just like in your test.
Sigma 70-300 APO versus the Nikon 70-300G or the Sigma 105 vs Nikon 105 would make sense...but it wouldn't make much sense if I compare a Sigma 50mm f1.4, a Tamron 200-500, and a Nikon 18-135.....so I guess I just don't see what this test is supposed to show..?
Sigma 70-300 APO versus the Nikon 70-300G or the Sigma 105 vs Nikon 105 would make sense...but it wouldn't make much sense if I compare a Sigma 50mm f1.4, a Tamron 200-500, and a Nikon 18-135.....so I guess I just don't see what this test is supposed to show..?