The first one strikes me as visual chaos. I don't see any visual center, really. It's not obvious to me what I am supposed to be looking at, so I look at everything, and there's just piles of detail and stuff everywhere. Is that snow and ice? Or water? The processing makes it unclear what quite a bit of the stuff even is. The HDRing has killed the light pretty thoroughly. The fairly strong perspective solves some of the problems that light solves, which is good, but there are still unsolved problems: The image looks quite flat, especially the foreground, and the lack of shadows again makes the entire image seem equally important which circles back to the "what am I supposed to be looking at in here?" problem.
The second is a much stronger composition. Again, the light has been killed by the HDR, but the perspective and composition are strong enough to carry the image without the help of a strong modeling light. It's clear where I am supposed to be looking, the depth in the scene is clear. There's just as much detail as in the first one, but it's more organized into "this stuff is important" and "this stuff is to be enjoyed at your leisure". Also, the sky is much more interesting, which helps out a bit more here.
I dislike the first, and quite like the second. They're both a little hard to look at due to my prejudices as an Old Dude, but that's on me, not you.