Some recent stuff.

[Digger...]

Thumper,

Binky,

 

[Digger...]

Only just noticed the cocky was f/16, dont really like going higher than 11.

 

[Jeff15]

A nice set ...

 

[21limited]

Only just noticed the cocky was f/16, dont really like going higher than 11.

If you didn't notice immediately, why does it matter? I'm always puzzled by folks who cling the benefits of certain technical aspects in the exif, rather than the image itself. With sharpening software like topaz, and it'a ability to limit the effects fo diffraction, it's a whole new world. It used to be an image had to be sharp enough to look good. These days it only has to be sharp enough for Topaz or other post processing software to make it look good.

 

[Digger...]

If you didn't notice immediately, why does it matter? I'm always puzzled by folks who cling the benefits of certain technical aspects in the exif, rather than the image itself. With sharpening software like topaz, and it'a ability to limit the effects fo diffraction, it's a whole new world. It used to be an image had to be sharp enough to look good. These days it only has to be sharp enough for Topaz or other post processing software to make it look good.

Im not one for computers, especially the slow ancient laptop here thats still running a 17 + year old version of windows something or other and there's no proper paid editing software on it. If there was it wouldn't/couldn't run anyway .

What i do edit is just free app stuff on the tablet and that's just basic tweaks when there needed, so yeah I'd rather get it right mostly in the camera because of these 2 issues.

So its all good.

 

[jeffashman]

Nice images! I really like the white cockatoo against the blue sky, and f/16 worked very well for that one.

 

[Digger...]

and f/16 worked very well for that one.

Hmmmm...