What's new

What equipment should i look into?

jxeee

TPF Noob!
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm an amateur photographer, you can see some of my work at joeblockley.co.uk

I currently use my phone (Samsung galaxy s3) for my photography, and I need something better if I wish to progress with my work and photography in general, so what's a good camera for amateur photographers and mainly macro photography (as that's my main interest).

Thanks, Joe.

P.S. If you are going to advise me you need to know I take macro pictures of mainly nature with the odd scenic picture or macro picture of other objects, thanks.
 
Nikon D4s and a 24-70 2.8 and a 105 2.8 macro lens
 
What's your budget? Ideally, a high MP body like the Nikon D810 paired with a 105mm micro. But I'm going to assume that's way over budget?

So we need your budget, what kind of experience you have (if any) with cameras, etc.

Jake


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm looking for something under 1000, it doesn't need to be amazing just not a phone, and the options for lenses would be good, too.
 
Also, I have a bit of experience with cameras, but basic, not experienced or anything, I'm really just starting out.
 
1000 what - the country your in would help since it might drastically affect how much spending power that actually is.

As for a recommendation I would say go Canon. Not because I'm canon shooter, but because if macro is your aim and your love then there's a chance that if the bug bites hard you'll want to start getting more and more magnification. Canon produces the only lens that goes beyond 1:1 magnification on the current market (1:1 is the standard most macro prime DSLR lenses get to) and then goes on to 5:1.

For an idea of what that means in real world terms here's a 0.5:1 which is about what you're getting (if a bit more) with your current camera:
3235277616_f83e34be7f_o.jpg


And a 1:1
3234315137_6757fe72bf_o.jpg


And a 5:1
5378988644_f9652b3a4e_z.jpg

(that bug is somewhere around 2mm long at most and likely shorter).
Note these are not exact, but close enough.



However that is long in the future. For now I would suggest a DSLR camera body combined with a macro lens of 90mm or longer in focal length. Note that for macro photography what you want are prime lenses (single focal length - ergo no zoon) as whilst there are zoom lenses on the market with "macro" in the name they, at best, only get to the 0.5:1. It's more a close focusing setup than proper macro (its just used for marketing).

A few suggestions on lenses would be:
Tamon 90mm f2.8 macro
Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro (original second hand - or the new with OS)
Canon 100mm f2.8 macro (original second hand)
Canon 100mm f2.8 IS L macro (new but very pricy)
Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro (original second hand - or the new with OS)
Sigma 180mm f2.8 macro

Note whilst some of those are out of production and now second hand only they are still top rate lenses, the new versions having only very minor gains optically over the former versions. Macro lenses are sharp and well made across the board so optical quality is normally not a concern unless you're being very picky.

Camera body wise mostly any body that fits into your budget would suit for this kind of work - from Rebel entry level up to midrange bodies. If you get reconditioned or second hand you can save some cost (reconditioned are basically like brand new - they are oft old demo/display cameras and all are fixed up by Canon before being sold as reconditioned so they are good as new).

Ontop of that I'd suggest a speedlite flash - this helps give you more lighting control which will really help in macro photography. An own brand like a 430EX or a 3rd party speedlite (I can't recommend models but I'm sure some will chip in with suggestions) would suit and can save some money over top end options.


Once you've got that basic core kit you might look to something like a Lumiquest Softbox or similar sized softbox to fit into the flash directly to soften the light (note those cheap omnibounce options don't work for this kind of photography - they work by making light bounce around a room making the walls the source - but for this you can't do that so you want a softbox to make the light source (relative to subject) bigger and this soften the light).
 
Hi, thanks a lot overread, I appreciate the long post.
I'm in England, if that helps at all. But thanks a lot.
 
Check out WEX then or your local store; I'd suggest:

Sigma 105mm OS macro Sigma 105mm f2.8 Macro EX DG OS HSM - Canon Fit (258954) - Wex Photographic
Canon 430EX2 Canon Speedlite 430EX II Flashgun (2805B003AA) - Wex Photographic

Then you've got a choice - bit more money and
Canon EOS 700D Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm IS STM Lens (8596B027AA) - Wex Photographic

Or hit the second hand market for something that fits
Used Canon DSLR Cameras - Used Cameras - Wex Photographic

You can also try ebay.

Get an idea of what bodies fit your budget and then you can compare them and find out which one ranks well for you.
 
Thanks a bunch, appreciate it.
 
No problem - note that the second hand bodies on WEX don't have any lens with them - whilst the 700D I noted does come with a kit lens (you can get the body only for cheaper without the kit lens on the same site). A kit lens might be of use; whilst macro lenses can be used for normal photography the 105mm range is quite long - a standard kit lens would serve you well as good generalist starting point.
 
Ok, thanks, maybe once I've got me a camera I'll send you what I've got. Thanksss
 
Many of the cameras recommended are more than okay. But any camera equivalent to or better than a Canon T2i can be had (body only) fro around the $2-300 USD range. take the rest and If you get a Canon) look for a used or refurbed 24-105 IS USM L lens. Or any equivalent lens that will fit the camera you buy. It is the LENS and the photographers eye that are the two most critical components...almost any camera made by the top 3 in the past 10 years will do the work. ALWAYS get your lens's before chasing the latest, greatest camera body.
 
Last edited:
Well I'm a Nikon shooter myself. So yup, I'm going to recommend you follow Overread's advice and go Canon - if macro is your main interest then I think you'll find that the lenses he mentions will suit you far better in the long run than what Nikon currently offers.

Don't get me wrong, I love my Nikons and would never switch myself - but then macro photography isn't my bag.
:)
 

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom