Stradawhovious
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 3,241
- Reaction score
- 911
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Well, the much anticipated Nikkor 180mm AF-D f/2.8 arrived, and I couldn't be happier.....
Maybe....
For those of you not familiar with my previous rants, I purchased a heavily used Nikkor 180mm AF ED f2.8 for $200 on the intrabays.
So here goes the good.....
the lens is in a lot better condition than the seller advertised. Many of the "damage" on the lens were just smudges that cleaned right of with a microcloth
This thing is really sharp, and the focus is spot on. This image is a 100% crop, and the picture was shot from the hip. From OOF, to the eye, depressed half way, shutter clicked the second focus locked. No messing around, just focus/click. So far, so good.

DSC_5331 pp by Stradawhovious, on Flickr
Ok, now Bokeh. This thing provides BEAUTIFUL creamy backgrounds. This one is a f/3.2, and hastily shot, but you get the idea.

DSC_5270 by Stradawhovious, on Flickr
Now on the the not so good.
Under certain circumstances there seems to be some pretty serious CA issues. More than you would expect from a $1000+ lens. If you look close (may not be visible without original file) in the kiddo's hair, middle of the bangs just above the nose, there is some pretty serious purple fringing. Not seemingly an issue unless you're pixel peeping, but enough to irritate me..... especially when I don't know enough about PP to get rid of it. My guess is that they corespond with nicks on the front element, since it isn't evenly dispersed throughout the pic, but only in certain spots.
Overall, getting a $1,000+ lens (back in the day)for $200, I guess you shouldn't expect the world.
My questions..... Any good tutorials or tips on removing small areas of CA from photos? Also, what else should I be doing with this lens to push it to the limits. There is a 7 day return policy, that I would like to use if necessary. So far though, I think I can live with it If I can get used to using it.
Maybe....
For those of you not familiar with my previous rants, I purchased a heavily used Nikkor 180mm AF ED f2.8 for $200 on the intrabays.
So here goes the good.....
the lens is in a lot better condition than the seller advertised. Many of the "damage" on the lens were just smudges that cleaned right of with a microcloth
This thing is really sharp, and the focus is spot on. This image is a 100% crop, and the picture was shot from the hip. From OOF, to the eye, depressed half way, shutter clicked the second focus locked. No messing around, just focus/click. So far, so good.

DSC_5331 pp by Stradawhovious, on Flickr
Ok, now Bokeh. This thing provides BEAUTIFUL creamy backgrounds. This one is a f/3.2, and hastily shot, but you get the idea.

DSC_5270 by Stradawhovious, on Flickr
Now on the the not so good.
Under certain circumstances there seems to be some pretty serious CA issues. More than you would expect from a $1000+ lens. If you look close (may not be visible without original file) in the kiddo's hair, middle of the bangs just above the nose, there is some pretty serious purple fringing. Not seemingly an issue unless you're pixel peeping, but enough to irritate me..... especially when I don't know enough about PP to get rid of it. My guess is that they corespond with nicks on the front element, since it isn't evenly dispersed throughout the pic, but only in certain spots.
Overall, getting a $1,000+ lens (back in the day)for $200, I guess you shouldn't expect the world.
My questions..... Any good tutorials or tips on removing small areas of CA from photos? Also, what else should I be doing with this lens to push it to the limits. There is a 7 day return policy, that I would like to use if necessary. So far though, I think I can live with it If I can get used to using it.
Last edited: