Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
NO...IT IS EMBEDDED. World of difference.Ummm - - it is linked. .
NO...IT IS EMBEDDED. World of difference.Ummm - - it is linked. .
ARRRRRRGH. <Multiple deletes.> Chuck, if you really feel this way, then you are a prick and do not deserve any further interaction. Good day.
You need to look at TPF FAQ's, especially the 3rd Down
Blatently, like what others are saying, it should be Linked like this and not the actual picture showing.
Her Then and Now shot is interesting to see how she has ages, but still, those eyes are still piercing
There are not if's, and's or but's about this.
~Michael~
If we can see it and it's not your's, it shouldn't be there. That's basically what that's saying.
I have been searching Google for a about 20 min and haven't found anything technical about this photo.
Steve McCurry's e-mail is [email protected].
I considered e-mailing him and just asking the source?
~Michael~
Now, back to anyone who might have some technical info on how this pic was taken so that we can learn from it.
Umm... Sorry, but what do you really expect to learn from knowing the technical specs?
You are referring to shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and all that - right?
(If not, we need further clarification on what you are asking.)
Judging by the DOF, I would guess somewhere between f/2.8 and f/4 - but closer to 2.8. Shutter speed is really of no importance in a shot like this; yeah, fast enough to hand hold, but other than that - it doesn't matter.
Whatever it took to get the 'right' exposure.
Aperture can be guessed close enough, and the rest doesn't really matter.
The only other thing (that I'm not going to guess at) is what lens he used.
Not sure how much that would really help either...
You can learn more by looking at the photo than you can by reading the 'exif'.