I know he wasn't responding to me (but to KmH), I just wanted to mention that I too believe the D90 is entry level.I thought he was rhetorically referring to the old show Home Improvement, with Tim Allen....You can think whatever you want, it's a plastic body that lacks weather sealing and even a high end AF system. It's not an insult to the camera, but it certainly is entry level (highend of the consumer line) just as the T1i is entry level.I don't think so Tim.![]()
And lastly--I don't want to sound snarky, but I do think the older Sigma 70-200/2.8 models are sub-par in terms of AF speed, based on the number of posters over the years who have reported similar complaints, and have then switched to the 70-200 VR since 2003. If you want, I can refer you to a small brick and mortar photo store that has three 70-200 VR's at $1,200 each. PM me if you do.
I'm KmH, not Tim.Yes, they are that much better at AF and have far better ISO performance than a D90.2.) Noise.
Big question: Are those two cameras THAT much better at AF and Noise reduction?
![]()
The D90 is an entry-level camera. The D3/1D and 70-200 mm's are/were flagship, top-of-the-line, full professional gear.
I don't think so Tim.