chaseman24 said:
This is definitely a topic I would like to hear MUCH more commenting on.
Thanks,
Chase
oky doky....
firstly, allow me to wax philosophic:
- this is a private forum owned by Chase. the rules here are dictated by him and carried out by people that have been appointed by him. that's the way private ownership works.
- people have come to expect some things:
- either full freedom in line with their OWN expectations or
- a document of sorts that state the rules
- if rules are created 'on the fly', announce the rules in a dignified fashion.
now some mind bending stuff.
you know what true freedom is? true freedom is the absence of law and order. it is exactly that. true freedom is inherently bad (history bears this out). therefore; there needs to be....
- a mission. this is evident in the forums that are available.
- a ruleset and moderation. this is clearly established.
so the rules are stated and enforced and the board has a mission. there's no problem here.....
until you mix in subjective thoughts. then personal gripes can bring down entire rulesets (that worked to begin with) and thus begins the crumbling into 'true freedom'; chaos. further, the attempt to moderate to a faux utopia is not apparent. and this is a good thing.
all that being said, in my time here i've yet to see anyone banned. think about this: that's what happens if you break the rules. i've seen no one banned. i've seen debate. that happens. it's supposed to happen. it's a gel.
personally, i happen to think this forum is very well run. there are many other photography forums; i choose to spend my time here. i don't have a **** load of time to engage in multiple forums. there's no fascist regime here; merely a guiding by people that do their jobs. matter of fact, i've rarely seen 'obvious moderation'. the mods here post in the forums just like every other member, but do a boat load behind the scenes to keep it running smoothly.
my only advice to you, Chase, is to not look for a problem where there is only subjective issue.