I think some people misunderstood the meaning of my origonal post. [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Thom Hogan has a good point about not trying to skimp, finding out it doesn't work so step up as little as possible, finding out it does better but still does not work etc. etc. etc. until you have spent more than you would if you had just done it right in the first place.
I have $350 in my tripod, 3021B Pro legs, 322RC2 head and a panning plate between the base and head. It is more than my equipment needs without being overkill and works fine. I'm not dropping 600mm + lenses on it. If I was I would be spending more for stronger legs and some kind of gimble mount, probably a Wembly.
What I was trying to point out is that the tripod is just as important as the camera body or lens when one is needed. Spend what needs to be done to match the equipment you have the first time. It will last a long time. As long ago at T[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]hom Hogan wrote that article, I doubt that he would have to spend as much now as he did then. Big glass is lighter, tripods are stonger, but he would still buy what he needs the first time instead of working his way into it by trial and error. [/FONT]