Feezor
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 74
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- So Cal
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Hey guys after much practice and patience I have started getting some decent macro pictures. I have been borrowing a friends Canon 100mm 2.8 (non L lens) for almost a month and am ready to start looking for my own.
I could not find if this had been asked before but as much as I would love to have a 180mm macro alot of people have basically talked me out of it due to the fact you HAVE to be further away for the subject, where as the 100 mm you can get physically closer and if you want to be physically further away you can just get extension tubes.
Anyway so I was curious as to the difference between the Canon 100mm macro 2.8 and the 100mm "L". To me it looks like just the build quality as in weather sealing and more robust exterior. I am pretty cautious with all my gear although it is a peice of mind knowing you have a more robust lens.
But picture quality wise is there really a difference for a non professional?
Non "L"
Canon - 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro Autofocus Lens - 4657A006 - B&H
"L"
Canon - EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Lens - 3554B002 - B&H Photo
Any input appreciated
And just for reference here are the two 180mm I WAS looking at if anyone wants to try and talk me back into one of these
Tamron
Tamron - 180mm f/3.5 Macro Autofocus Lens for Can - AFB01C700 -
Sigma
Sigma - Telephoto 180mm f/3.5 EX DG APO Macro IF HSM - 105101 -
I could not find if this had been asked before but as much as I would love to have a 180mm macro alot of people have basically talked me out of it due to the fact you HAVE to be further away for the subject, where as the 100 mm you can get physically closer and if you want to be physically further away you can just get extension tubes.
Anyway so I was curious as to the difference between the Canon 100mm macro 2.8 and the 100mm "L". To me it looks like just the build quality as in weather sealing and more robust exterior. I am pretty cautious with all my gear although it is a peice of mind knowing you have a more robust lens.
But picture quality wise is there really a difference for a non professional?
Non "L"
Canon - 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro Autofocus Lens - 4657A006 - B&H
"L"
Canon - EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Lens - 3554B002 - B&H Photo
Any input appreciated
And just for reference here are the two 180mm I WAS looking at if anyone wants to try and talk me back into one of these
Tamron
Tamron - 180mm f/3.5 Macro Autofocus Lens for Can - AFB01C700 -
Sigma
Sigma - Telephoto 180mm f/3.5 EX DG APO Macro IF HSM - 105101 -