fractionofasecond
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2012
- Messages
- 135
- Reaction score
- 21
- Location
- Hopewell, New Jersey
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
One thing many people new to photography (who are looking to buy a camera) don't realize, is that any system you buy into... you are basically going to have to stay with that system. After investing money in a body, and lenses (that only fit that body)... as well as any other system specific accessories they may purchase, it is very hard to justify changing to another system (as well as very expensive).
Just assuming that as they progress.. they want better bodies and lenses, and may even eventually decide to go PRO... they should pick a system that is capable of supporting that future! Canon and Nikon both have extensive Prosumer and Professional lineups for Bodies, lenses and other need accessories. They are also compatible with almost all third party accessories and lenses.
Sony has neither a PRO line, nor does Sony have the width of compatibility with many third party accessories that Nikon and Canon enjoy. Buying a Sony (and locking yourself into that system) can cause issues in the future, should one decide to go beyond being a casual hobbyist photographer. This is one of the biggest reasons that I feel Sony is not a good choice for a serious beginner..... we should always plan for the future, after all!
What do you consider a "pro" camera? The new Sony A99 looks pretty damn nice to me. Only thing with sony, they have the lenses available you need, but not 50 different versions of the same lens. But the G glass lenses and Carl Zeiss lenses look pretty "professional" to me.
Not to mention, I have the entry level A37 and if you actually read reviews or owned one, the ISO performance is pretty impressive for an entry level. Consider doing some more research before you assume it's sh!t because it's a Sony.
Google some performance tests of various Sony Alpha's, it produces usable images at 6,400 ISO which is pretty impressive for a camera under $500- not that I would ever shoot at 6,400 ISO...
Comparing these 3, the Sony has a 15 point AF and shoots 12 fps compared to Canon- 9 point AF and 4 FPS and Nikon- 11 points AF and 5fps. I belive this article is about best "bang for your buck" and I think it's obvious which is.
Last edited: