placeonthecorner
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2006
- Messages
- 110
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Website
- www.raisingmissjune.co.uk
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
hi folks...
So today we had some 'Professional' photographers come into the college to give us some lectures on what they did and how they got there. Im at the very begining of my first year on a degree coarse so i was looking forward to getting a little insight. There were 3 lectures in all - 1. A guy who owned his own photography company who specialised in weddings but also did portraits and still life 2. A guy who worked in photographing buildings and then transfering them into stone for the visualy impared 3. A girl who finished my coarse last year and who has gone on to start her own buisness.
The girl was extremely pleasent and had done some great work for local magazines and businesses but didnt really have direction. She had attempted to get an agent in london but they said it was too 'early' for her so she's just doing local stuff now.
Theres not alot to say about the 2nd guy coz his stuff was REALLY left field and not really applicable here.
Now the first guy, and this is what im trying to get at, seemed to really have his head screwed on - in a business sense. I wont mention names coz i dont want to get any heat, but he said his work had won every commercial award going and that he only had one award left to get this year. He kept telling us how much money he'd made and how he was spending it on his house ( really annoying ). So i dont think any of us were impressed with his personality. He also got VERY defensive when someone pointed out that alot of his work was heavily photoshoped. But anyway, i waffle.
What i was wondering is, is it posibble to be a photographer and just stay in one field of the genre, and still make a decent living? This guy and alot of others we've seen seem to dabble in all kinds of genres and dont seem to stick to one type. I know this is the best way to make money, but after he said that he was getting all these awards for all his different kinds of work, it got me wondering if my artistic and more origional sense of picture taking was gonna have to stay a hobby rather than something i could do fulltime? My plan , even tho its early days, was to travel and take photos along the way, and go up to the highlands to photograph places and things no one had seen before. But if i want to do this is it realistic that im going to have to fund my style by doing more commercial photography?
If anyone makes it this far thanx for reading - im not good with words
So today we had some 'Professional' photographers come into the college to give us some lectures on what they did and how they got there. Im at the very begining of my first year on a degree coarse so i was looking forward to getting a little insight. There were 3 lectures in all - 1. A guy who owned his own photography company who specialised in weddings but also did portraits and still life 2. A guy who worked in photographing buildings and then transfering them into stone for the visualy impared 3. A girl who finished my coarse last year and who has gone on to start her own buisness.
The girl was extremely pleasent and had done some great work for local magazines and businesses but didnt really have direction. She had attempted to get an agent in london but they said it was too 'early' for her so she's just doing local stuff now.
Theres not alot to say about the 2nd guy coz his stuff was REALLY left field and not really applicable here.
Now the first guy, and this is what im trying to get at, seemed to really have his head screwed on - in a business sense. I wont mention names coz i dont want to get any heat, but he said his work had won every commercial award going and that he only had one award left to get this year. He kept telling us how much money he'd made and how he was spending it on his house ( really annoying ). So i dont think any of us were impressed with his personality. He also got VERY defensive when someone pointed out that alot of his work was heavily photoshoped. But anyway, i waffle.
What i was wondering is, is it posibble to be a photographer and just stay in one field of the genre, and still make a decent living? This guy and alot of others we've seen seem to dabble in all kinds of genres and dont seem to stick to one type. I know this is the best way to make money, but after he said that he was getting all these awards for all his different kinds of work, it got me wondering if my artistic and more origional sense of picture taking was gonna have to stay a hobby rather than something i could do fulltime? My plan , even tho its early days, was to travel and take photos along the way, and go up to the highlands to photograph places and things no one had seen before. But if i want to do this is it realistic that im going to have to fund my style by doing more commercial photography?
If anyone makes it this far thanx for reading - im not good with words