jaya28
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- IL
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Hi everyone been awhile since I have posted here.Hope everyone has been doing good.
Well since my last post last year LOL I got the canon 50D (love it) Got the tammy 17-50 f2.8 like it, and the canon-300. Well looking to get another lens stated looking at the 24-105L and the 28-128 (had this one for a while and sold it) But I did like it. And the 24-70L .
I am kinda leaning to the 28-135 and with the extra money I save I can get the 100mm marco.
But still kinda wanna buy the 24-105 but I have read tons and tons of reviews on the 3 lens alot of people don't really have to many probs with the 28-135 other than plastic and no weather sealed And not a L lens.
But man the reviews on the 2 L lens theres all kind of people having bad copies of both them L lens. For that kind of cash I would think there should be no probs with the lenes. I have heard bad lens flare, after a year the diafram goes bad, having to send in to canon to adjust . I mean it goes on and on. To the point kind of scared to drop a grand on something that might not work right.
I like tamron but I find alot of the time 50 just not enough reach.
but I love the 2.8 any other lens out there that has the reach of around 15- 105 in the f2.8? With image close to the L's.
Or just keep the ones I have and get the 10-22 don't have any real wides
and I don't have a marco lens. Will the 28-135 work as a marco lens?
sorry for the long post
Jay
Well since my last post last year LOL I got the canon 50D (love it) Got the tammy 17-50 f2.8 like it, and the canon-300. Well looking to get another lens stated looking at the 24-105L and the 28-128 (had this one for a while and sold it) But I did like it. And the 24-70L .
I am kinda leaning to the 28-135 and with the extra money I save I can get the 100mm marco.
But still kinda wanna buy the 24-105 but I have read tons and tons of reviews on the 3 lens alot of people don't really have to many probs with the 28-135 other than plastic and no weather sealed And not a L lens.
But man the reviews on the 2 L lens theres all kind of people having bad copies of both them L lens. For that kind of cash I would think there should be no probs with the lenes. I have heard bad lens flare, after a year the diafram goes bad, having to send in to canon to adjust . I mean it goes on and on. To the point kind of scared to drop a grand on something that might not work right.
I like tamron but I find alot of the time 50 just not enough reach.
but I love the 2.8 any other lens out there that has the reach of around 15- 105 in the f2.8? With image close to the L's.
Or just keep the ones I have and get the 10-22 don't have any real wides
and I don't have a marco lens. Will the 28-135 work as a marco lens?
sorry for the long post
Jay
