I don't know if it is the Kodak Easyshare, its lens and tiny sensor that let your photos appear to be "fuzzy" to the keen eyes of those who love to work with the sharpest and best of lenses. I guess, this IS the sharpness your camera can achieve.
And I appreciate the fact that you took this photo on an overcast day, so you didn't get any distrancting shadows.
Is this your original composition or a cropped version of a frame that looked different originally? If it is a crop, I'd like to see the entire photo.
You could bring out some more highlights in post.
Does GIMP give you a histogramme? It is the representation of light, midtones and shadows in the shape of a mountain (in the ideal case). Ah, before I try to explain too much, here is the histogramme of one of my still "original" photos
The amount of shadows show on the left, my photo is primarily midtones, and lacking in highlights, as toward the right the mountain ends even before it reaches the end of the coordinate system.
I would guess that your histogramm would also show a lack of highlights, and you could add so many that you meet the end of the coordinate system.
It is best never to get steep lines upwards neither to the left (shadows) nor the right (highlights) as that indicates a photo is either severely underexposed (all black shadows), or severely overexposed (all bright highlights, also called "blown highlights").
If GIMP offers you histogrammes, check it out. You might get some more lustre to your orchids.