Photo Manipulation

ksmattfish said:
I'll agree with you that it's not very creative, but there are plenty of folks calling it art. ;)

http://ensemble.va.com.au/array/chap_00.html

http://www.artnet.com/Magazine/index/honigman/honigman12-22-9.asp
It only works as Art if it has value - and the ones that make you laugh because the artist was taking the p*ss have value. It's when the artist takes themself seriously that problems occur.
Duchamp was making a point about the nature of Art - basicaly trying to get people to re-examine their pre-conceived notions of it.
As for the others - some are having fun, some are just pretentious and at least one got a sexual thrill out of watching people urinate. Make up your own minds which fit where.


(You Google interesting things, KSMatt. Thank God Amanda didn't mention pooing her pants! :lmao: )
 
Hertz van Rental said:
(You Google interesting things, KSMatt. Thank God Amanda didn't mention pooing her pants! :lmao: )

I was just struck by what you wrote; besides Serrano's Piss Christ, I was pretty sure pee had been called art before. :)
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top