Photomatix standalone Vs. PS Plugin or something else?

Discussion in 'Graphics Programs and Photo Gallery' started by Johnboy2978, Sep 14, 2007.

  1. Johnboy2978

    Johnboy2978 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,797
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    Southwest Virginia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I have been fiddling w/ HDR and I'm unimpressed w/ my ability to use CS2 to make a nice HDR. I am sure it has more power and ability to do a HDR justice than I am capable of. I downloaded the trial of Photomatix as well as the plugin for CS2. I really like this and am considering purchasing either the stand alone or the plug in. Is the stand alone that much more feature rich? I can't really see a difference.

    If there is something else out there that people like, I'd be interested to know. I tried the freebie open source one "qtpfsgui" but was rather unimpressed w/ it.

    Here's 2 examples I did today from a construction project I am working on for the company I work for. What can I do to improve these? I still can figure out how to get that surreal look, not that I necessarily want it in these.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

photomatix on photoshop vs standalone

,
photomatix photoshop plugin or standalone
,
photomatix plug in or stand alone
,
photomatix plug in vs
,
photomatix plug in vs stand alone version
,
photomatix plugin or standalone
,
photomatix plugin vs standalone
,

photomatix ps plugin

,
photomatix stand alone or plugin
,
photomatix standalone