I am surprised at the closed minded and lack of understanding here...
the picture is out of focus? really? duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....
The only thing I was going for was the cats fur and the tile floor creating the illusion of an 'S' figure... I feel like that worked very well... And I think the effect is better because it's a little out of focus...
I'm actually shocked of the closed mindedness of some of the people on here... GL!
First off, you need to learn how to post to get comments. Your original thread asked if "this photo has any value", and then you claimed you got lucky. Now you are claiming that you intended to get this shot. You should have given all the pertinent information in your first post to let viewers respond appropriately. I highly doubt your intent was to get a shot where the blur of the cat completed an 's' curve with the floor pattern. What I see, with you calling it "luck", is that you went through your images, and saw this after the fact, and thought it was neat. Does it redeem the image? No. If you can't convey your intent of a photograph of to the viewer, it is less successful.
"Is it a keeper?" Well, now we need to know what your end goal with photography is. I ask my self five questions. Does it express my view of the world, is it interesting, is it a quality shot, does it have artistic value, and is it sellable. While I may give one of my images high marks to all those questions, somebody else will probably not. Everybody has their own standards. I would like you to tell me your standards for a great shot.
"The effect is better because it's a little out of focus." This statement is pretty telling to me. Can you differentiate between blur and focus? This image wouldn't work at all with out the blur. It actually may have been more successful if it were focused.
"Closed mindedness." Don't make me ****ing laugh. At this point I have to decide whether I make use of the forums ignore feature, or eagerly await your next post for CC so it can be ripped to shreds. I think I am going with the former, because judging by what I have seen, the latter is a waste of time.
With 'mom2eights' comment, *pfft*. I do the same. I look at the work of people who give positive review of bad images to see where they are coming from. :thumbup: