- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
- Messages
- 8,797
- Reaction score
- 4,893
- Location
- Connecticut
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I like the Ninja Idea.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Don't forget the badger, we need the badger.
What to do with the coconut?
DarkShadow said:Dang, dat girl got some beautiful eyes in dat santa coat.
Accepting money for something makes one a pro. It doesn't make one accomplished, just a pro. There in lies the problem, people think that the word professional in a business like this means something. All it means is they make money, not that they are accomplished.Is it still not clear that accepting money for something does not make one a Pro?
Accepting money for something makes one a pro.Is it still not clear that accepting money for something does not make one a Pro?
They were professional girls scouts, but were they accomplished girl scouts?Accepting money for something makes one a pro.Is it still not clear that accepting money for something does not make one a Pro?
I bet we could extend this thread to 1000 pages if folks had time to debate 'accepting money for something makes one a pro' statement.
Chris Rock's daughters are probably pro's based on the amount of cash they accepted from the Hollywoods, but the scouts that accepted my money were just.....Girl Scouts.
They were professional girls scouts, but were they accomplished girl scouts?Accepting money for something makes one a pro.Is it still not clear that accepting money for something does not make one a Pro?
I bet we could extend this thread to 1000 pages if folks had time to debate 'accepting money for something makes one a pro' statement.
Chris Rock's daughters are probably pro's based on the amount of cash they accepted from the Hollywoods, but the scouts that accepted my money were just.....Girl Scouts.
Is it the same or not? And which bit does the photographer breach?Difficult to comment without knowing both sides. How many pics did she get, did she have a chance to pick the best from a set? It sounds like the photographer was not very professional, but many would say that $1500 is not very expensive for a wedding.
Respectfully, there is no other side as the contract is spelled out. The photographer did not perform all the actions spelled out in the contract. Here is a link to the contract, it is real close to this if not the same as I recall.
Contract for Wedding Photography Services
That's not a website, it's a facebook page and if that's all the photographer has, I wouldn't have even considered them in the first place!Studio 34 Photography by Chrissie BattThat's pretty generic; all it calls for him to do is show up and take pictures. I doubt that there's a substantial or relevant portion that isn't at least partially fulfilled under law. In addition to a letter from a solicitor, I would also inquire with the appropriate local office to see if he's licensed to conduct business in that area.Respectfully, there is no other side as the contract is spelled out. The photographer did not perform all the actions spelled out in the contract. Here is a link to the contract, it is real close to this if not the same as I recall.
Contract for Wedding Photography Services
I would NOT be so quick or positive about a successful resolution in small claims court. Your assistant will have to demonstrate that her images are markedly different than those she was shown.
No real 'pro' would blame the venue; as Gary points out, any pro worth his salt will have done a venue recce ahead of time, talked to the Rector/Officiant about dos and don'ts and asked for tips. Any chance we could get a link to the photographer's website?
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
I don't do Facebook, maybe y'all can see