$1000+ tripods are probably studio or video models: big, complicated, not meant to be moved much.
Typically you should be able to find a good tripod for still photography for under $500. The use of high tech, weight reducing materials can drive up the price.
IMHO, there are basically 2 kinds of tripods: some are cheap, light, and unrepairable, and others are expensive, heavy, and can be repaired.
If your camera isn't very heavy you can probably get away with a sub-$100 tripod, although it will eventually wear-out/break if you use it a lot; they are made of thin aluminum and plastic. On the other hand they are very light, so easier to carry. The downside of a light tripod is that it isn't as stable as a heavy tripod, but you can hang you camera bag from it to add more weight. Spending $40 a year for a new tripod may be okay if you use it a lot and need super light weight.
If you are using giant zoom lenses, or medium and large format gear, or shooting in very windy conditions you'll need a heavy duty tripod. They are more expensive, but they can usually be repaired if damaged. Things can be tightened as they loosen, or replaced altogether. I've dragged my Bogen tripod around for over a decade now. Besides holding my cameras, it has survived being used as a hiking pole when climbing hills, submerged in rivers, rolling down hills/cliffs, etc... It's beat up, but I haven't had to replace anything yet. I think I paid about $350 for it, so that's under $35 a year. Although it's pretty heavy.