By that article, he did right: see #1.
your critique on metering is completely off-base.
If I had read your critique and then seen the shot second, I'd expect the world's worse underexposed shot coupled with the most distracting background ever--the shot was metered very well and the background was fine. The pole is hardly that distracting considering how OOF it is.
Yes it's something to be mindful of, and a lot of what you say is useful for that second shot posted, but your critique was just too hypercritical here.