What would be a good replacement for my 28:200mm lens

Discussion in 'Nikon Lenses' started by MissJones, Dec 4, 2011.

  1. MissJones
    Offline

    MissJones New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Washington
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I am looking to replace my 28:200 lens and need to know what will be a good replacement? Since I am still new to all of this I would like to get the most bang for my buck.

    The 28:200 is the lens from my N80 that I have been using on my D90. I need the replacement for the D90.
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2011
  2. GIULIAMAIKO
    Offline

    GIULIAMAIKO New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Go for 80/200 mm 2.8 d Ed this is a legend lens... Not too expensive...sweet lens but heavy
  3. GIULIAMAIKO
    Offline

    GIULIAMAIKO New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    For dx I require d300s .... But if you want a full frame body d700... Or d3x would be the best
  4. cgipson1
    Offline

    cgipson1 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    17,146
    Likes Received:
    4,356
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +4,356 / 0
    she's not looking for a body, my friend! She is looking for a lens! I agree that the 80-200 ED would be a great lens.. but they are still pricey.... $1000 or so. Far superior image quality to the Kit 80-200!
  5. cgipson1
    Offline

    cgipson1 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    17,146
    Likes Received:
    4,356
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +4,356 / 0
    MissJones... we need a price range to be able to make pertinent suggestions! :) Also.. what kind of shooting do you want to do with it?
  6. RRRoger
    Offline

    RRRoger New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Monterey Bay, California
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Try the new AF-S Nikkor 28-300, you won't go back!
  7. digital flower
    Offline

    digital flower New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    CT
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +36 / 0
    I would get the 80-200 2.8 as suggested. It is a big heavy lens that I don’t find um, appropriate for all shooting situations. I would add something like a Nikon 18-70, which can be had for around $200 used, to balance it out.
  8. djacobox372
    Offline

    djacobox372 New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,926
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +129 / 0
    The 80-200mm f2.8 is a great lens, and can be had for as little as $500 for the AF-D version.

    However; 80mm is very long on the telephoto end and it's very heavy for everyday use. Instead I would suggest a tamron 28-75mm f2.8, and replace your old 28-200mm with a 50-200mm VR AF-S.
  9. 2WheelPhoto
    Offline

    2WheelPhoto New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Messages:
    6,850
    Likes Received:
    994
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +994 / 0
    ??????????

    That might render about the same image quality as the 18-200 she is trying to dump.
  10. RRRoger
    Offline

    RRRoger New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Monterey Bay, California
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Not as good 18-27, and much better at 28-300.

Share This Page