vipgraphx
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,415
- Reaction score
- 440
- Location
- Some Where In the Desert
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
24mp FF and 24mp DX image size the same? I always thought that FF images where bigger thank DX images given MP the same.
I am wrong?? Looking at an image in Photoshop straight from camera RAW a 24mp FF measures 20 x 13.333 which is the same size of a 24mp DX
I have been under the impression that was one of the perks by having a full frame vs DX/crop frame. Where do you really start to see advantages, I thought that low light focusing would be an advantage with a FF, I thought that Bokeh /DOF would be better with FF, Less noise in FF vs DX, I thought that FX would have higher resolution as well over a DX but those same images are both 300dpi FF and DX.
where do you really start to see these advantages only at super high ISO?
If this is the case I have been looking at things all wrong..... if you don't really get higher resolution at same focal distance, ISO, F stop and exposure being all the same then whats really the point FF/DX?
I am wrong?? Looking at an image in Photoshop straight from camera RAW a 24mp FF measures 20 x 13.333 which is the same size of a 24mp DX
I have been under the impression that was one of the perks by having a full frame vs DX/crop frame. Where do you really start to see advantages, I thought that low light focusing would be an advantage with a FF, I thought that Bokeh /DOF would be better with FF, Less noise in FF vs DX, I thought that FX would have higher resolution as well over a DX but those same images are both 300dpi FF and DX.
where do you really start to see these advantages only at super high ISO?
If this is the case I have been looking at things all wrong..... if you don't really get higher resolution at same focal distance, ISO, F stop and exposure being all the same then whats really the point FF/DX?