What's new

3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197

I completely agree!! 90% of the math I am learning in college right now, I will NEVER use!
 
Maths is just in your head.
It's man-made and just a way of trying to model the Universe.
The Universe would still exist without Maths, but Maths couldn't exist without the Universe.



I spent a year learning how to do Laplace and Fourrier transforms the hard way - but they never once told me what they were for.
 
It isn't that you will ever solve the exact problems you solve in class ever again you'll use the method for solving that problem every day whether you know it or not.
 
Maths is just in your head.
It's man-made and just a way of trying to model the Universe.
The Universe would still exist without Maths, but Maths couldn't exist without the Universe.



I spent a year learning how to do Laplace and Fourrier transforms the hard way - but they never once told me what they were for.

Math is in no way trying to model the universe and it does exist without the universe. Math is a way to describe relationships between ideas. Fourier transforms and Laplace transforms are just what engineers get out of math they in no way represent the body of knowledge of real math.
 
Math is in no way trying to model the universe and it does exist without the universe. Math is a way to describe relationships between ideas. Fourier transforms and Laplace transforms are just what engineers get out of math they in no way represent the body of knowledge of real math.

Yes it is.
Maths is purely and simply a way of describing the Universe and how it works.
It reduces things to formulae. But the formulae, and Maths itself, is based on a number of assumptions.
We assume that the basic number system is base 10 - but this is just because we have a total of ten digits.
The Universe is not base 10 because if it were things like Pi would be whole numbers.
So we invented other base systems like binary but none of those work any better.
Maths developed Geometry to help describe the Universe, but straight lines and triangles and such do not occur naturally. Then Einstein showed that space is curved and distorted, not flat and Maths had to come up with non-Euclidian Geometry.
Logic is flawed because life isn't logical.
Set theory has flaws in it.
One could say that we had to invent computers so we had somewhere where Maths works the way it's supposed to.
Maths wouldn't exist without man.
I'm not saying Maths has no use or place in the World, just that it should be viewed in perspective.
And the only bit of Maths you need to get through life is basic Arithmetic. ;)


And I've read Principia Mathematica - have you? :lol:
 
Yes it is.
Maths is purely and simply a way of describing the Universe and how it works.
It reduces things to formulae. But the formulae, and Maths itself, is based on a number of assumptions.
We assume that the basic number system is base 10 - but this is just because we have a total of ten digits.
The Universe is not base 10 because if it were things like Pi would be whole numbers.
So we invented other base systems like binary but none of those work any better.
Maths developed Geometry to help describe the Universe, but straight lines and triangles and such do not occur naturally. Then Einstein showed that space is curved and distorted, not flat and Maths had to come up with non-Euclidian Geometry.
Logic is flawed because life isn't logical.
Set theory has flaws in it.
One could say that we had to invent computers so we had somewhere where Maths works the way it's supposed to.
Maths wouldn't exist without man.
I'm not saying Maths has no use or place in the World, just that it should be viewed in perspective.
And the only bit of Maths you need to get through life is basic Arithmetic. ;)


And I've read Principia Mathematica - have you? :lol:

Math has nothing to do with those forumulas and the base of our numbering system has nothing to do with PI being irrational it is irrational in any non irrational based numbering system. Non Euclidean geometry came out BEFORE Einstein. I would love it if you would point out the flaws that set theory has in it I'm taking that class right now.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom