Well guys, I am in a dilemma. I only have a d3000, i'm a college student and I am on a budget. I can say that I only use my DSLR for wildlife photos, otherwise I use my G12. I'm stuck on a sigma 70-300 4-5.6 (not APO), a nikkor 70-300 4-5.6, or a nikkor 55-200 VR 4-5.6. I know that the sigma is $170, the nikkor 70-300 is $150 and the 55-200 nikkor VR is $230. I'm stuck on the issue because the sigma has macro but I am quite sure that it isn't true macro, also would 55-200 even be viable for my use of it? Anyway, I will always be shooting in high light situations so low light is not an issue for me. What do you guys think? I am open to criticism and all opinions but please don't say I need a new camera, classes are expensive! Anyway, thanks for your time!