stk
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2017
- Messages
- 226
- Reaction score
- 249
- Location
- Norway
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
As I was waiting for the new Z-mount 20mm, I came over a really good price on the AF-S version...and bought it.
It's used, but I can't see any sign of wear so I assume there's nothing wrong with the lens. But I do experience some white balance problems.
I usually shoot everything in raw with auto white balance, and adjust the shots that needs it. Most of the time I'm happy with the auto white balance, and do nothing. With this lens, it seems like the auto misses more than with other lenses. I have only tanken indoor shots in bad indoor lighting, so not the best test, but I still feel that my other lenses (24 - 70 S, 50 S, AF-S 70 - 300 VR) performs way better. The 20 mm is usually too warm and too green.
It's not a big deal, but it triggers my curiosity.
Is this lens known for this? Is it the combination of camera, adapter and lens? Do I have a bad copy?
It's used, but I can't see any sign of wear so I assume there's nothing wrong with the lens. But I do experience some white balance problems.
I usually shoot everything in raw with auto white balance, and adjust the shots that needs it. Most of the time I'm happy with the auto white balance, and do nothing. With this lens, it seems like the auto misses more than with other lenses. I have only tanken indoor shots in bad indoor lighting, so not the best test, but I still feel that my other lenses (24 - 70 S, 50 S, AF-S 70 - 300 VR) performs way better. The 20 mm is usually too warm and too green.
It's not a big deal, but it triggers my curiosity.
Is this lens known for this? Is it the combination of camera, adapter and lens? Do I have a bad copy?