What's new

Being a Pro Photographer Isn't What It Used To Be

Actually it's Uncle Bob that is at the root of all this.
If we could get rid of him, we'd all be in clover.

No you wouldn't. The cam companies could never stay in biz without em. Besides, your a Bob yourself. You going to give up the button?
 
out of my realm of expertise. i will just chock it up to what i always think about these things. Digital killed photography.


Depends what you shoot. Digital opened up a lot of territory to me that would not have worked as well with film. On the other hand digital made it harder to do something with the pix cause of the overload of competition.
 
I grew up with cameras and was working the sidelines of professional football games starting in 1970, at that time there were possibly 6 photographers shooting a game. In 1974 high school there were 3-4 people with film cameras. While quite a few people did have some sort of film camera, they were not a household item, and the families I knew with cameras would have all the birthdays, Christmas, Easter and Thanksgiving pictures on the one roll in the camera. It has changed with digital, and in the past 12 years it started. Within the last 5 years the business started to go away, it became more difficult to keep good clients as some staff member owned a camera capable of producing an image they could use, it may not have been any good, but it was ok.

This is where we are at today. When I go to the same sidelines I started shooting on in 1970, there are now 20 photographers there, thing is there are still only 6 professionals shooting, the other 14 have no clients, are under equipped, and have no clue what they are doing. They managed to get passes through some bogus method(friend that works for the team usually) that will be tightened up next season.

The professionals are still working, but instead of sharing the loaf of bread that was there, we're all fighting over the crumbs now. Every now and then you manage to grab a few slices and if you're lucky, you get to keep them.


Everyone wants to be a sexy photog pulling in the big bucks!
 
our next step should be to see if we can take a photo, of someone taking a photo, of someone taking a photo.
To me "Pro" in terms of photography, relates to a degree of skill, experience and consistency. I often consider many photogs as pro because of the exceptional images they consistency capture. I try to overlook the accountant's term for professional and rate the photog's body of work.
is overlooking this body of work ever questionable as you don't know how many shots they took to come out with those pics or how much processing was done? I mean if you shoot a hundred thousand pics you could be bound to come up with fifty decent ones just by chit accident.
 
To me "Pro" in terms of photography, relates to a degree of skill, experience and consistency. I often consider many photogs as pro because of the exceptional images they consistency capture. I try to overlook the accountant's term for professional and rate the photog's body of work.
Those poor sods you see working for LifeTouch and Artona (big chain studios) as well as Walmart and Sears photo studios are technically professionals though are they really good? Nah...just like saying working at McDonald's makes you a cook.

Why use the term "professional" and just refer to a photographer as good or rubbish.
 
Photography is perhaps unique in that people frequently define 'professional' as 'good at it'.
Not unique. The term also works with almost any given art form:
Professional Dancer
Professional Singer
Professional Cook
Professional Blogger

a lot of Professional Photographers are just really good at Business.
 
I really suck at the business side of photography, always have.

fortunate that you are damn good at the photography end then isn't it?

Yep. I learned the business side from my Dad. I passed these words on to my kids " When it comes to money, just do the opposite of me, and you'll be fine" So far so good.
 
To me "Pro" in terms of photography, relates to a degree of skill, experience and consistency. I often consider many photogs as pro because of the exceptional images they consistency capture. I try to overlook the accountant's term for professional and rate the photog's body of work.
Those poor sods you see working for LifeTouch and Artona (big chain studios) as well as Walmart and Sears photo studios are technically professionals though are they really good? Nah...just like saying working at McDonald's makes you a cook.

Why use the term "professional" and just refer to a photographer as good or rubbish.
When I grew up in the film-only days, 'Pro" actually meant something when attached to photographer. When I was shooting news, we were all pros ... we'd call the exceptional news photogs "shooters". As in ... " Hey, isn't that Burrows. Man, he's a real shooter."
 
I have not seen those uses. I am a superb cook, but nobody calls me professional.

I have known some excellent dancers and singers and never heard them called professional. Perhaps this is a common usage elsewhere? The UK or similar?
 
Wow, just read through this discussion. Let me add my grain of salt...

I used to be a photographer for 3 different local newspapers in the early nineties. Back then, I was printing my own photos in my personal darkroom at home. Obviously, the ability to provide 5x7 B&W prints to the newspapers in a few hours was almost their condition #1 to be hired. Also, being local newspapers, most of the assignments were not suitable to push on your creativity button too much. It was all the typical local social stuff, like the mayor cutting ribbons, boring press conferences announcing they would change garbage day, etc. From this respect, digital photography has changed a lot of things because now, any journalist with a basic photo course can make very decent pictures with a small P&S camera during such events. I can't really blame newspapers to try to save the salary of the photographer sitting with a journalist at a 1hr press conference. Of course, having a pro photographer with too much time on his hands during a boring press conference can potentially turn up better pictures of 3 persons sitting behind a table than a journalist too busy taking notes, but seriously, nobody cares for such pictures.

This is why many photographers lost their jobs in recent years. The newspaper I work for now as a columnist in the weekend edition, used to have 15 full-time photographers, and they had about 6 part-time photographers. To make the story short, they eventually fired them all, and kept only one full-time photographer for the hard stuff (sports games, night life, food, shows, macro work, criminal stuff, etc).

So, the truth is; yes, digital photography made it so much easier for beginners to come up with a decent picture quick. No more darkroom chemistry, instant feedback to see if the picture is good or not, and for the most clueless ones, even automatic programs helping getting a good shot. It's never been easier to make good pictures than today, and fortunately for us, there are so many people buying cameras, that it has never been more affordable than now.

In fact, I see photographers like cobblers today. They were everywhere back in the days we used to buy quality shoes/boots and kept them for several years. Now, who brings old shoes to the cobbler to get them repaired? We just throw them away and buy news ones. Do cobblers have disappeared? Nope, but the remaining few are just dealing with the tough work no one else can do, and they are underpaid. Sounds familiar? As it was mentioned by others, the number of pictures available now, and their low cost, just doesn't make sense anymore today to hire a photographer to get similar shots for couple hundreds of dollars. Sorry, I've earned money with photography myself, and there's no way I could convince myself that a customer needs me to shoot his boring press conference. But, for the tough stuff, where creativity or the technical complexity of the shot is far beyond the knowledge of the weekend photographer, sure, I'm your man...

Unfortunately, some clients can't always see the difference between the work of a professional, and a weekend photographer, so they will strike for the cheaper of the two. That being said, some hobbyists are capable of excellent work that can be published, so on that end, we just can't dismiss them all based on the fact that they are not pros.
 
Last edited:
Just to add a little bit to this discussion, what happened to photographers in recent years also happened in many other fields... I see tons of parallels with photography, let's see...

I have a friend who's a musician and he made a new album recently. He recorded it, mixed it, mastered it, and produced it himself. He used all the same software the music industry is using, and he learned the whole thing by himself. In his case, it was either he does all by himself, or there's no album at all. While I'm no expert in music, to my ears, the sound quality is totally at par with what is sold today from the big bands in music stores. Maybe an audio engineer would pick on little things, but let's say my friend is probably at 95% of what a professional studio would have produced.

I'm a columnist for a major newspaper, and also a magazine writer, and the same problem has been happening in this field as well. In the past, those positions where held by "professional" journalists who had an interest in a specific field. They were writing articles or columns on top of their day job as a journalist. Of course, they were paid the same salary, which turned out to be very expensive in the end. Then, came the popularity of bloggers, and self proclaimed experts, so those magazines and newspapers opened up their pages to those "non professional" writers. They could pay them much less since they were not officially employed by the media, and quite frankly, would welcome the notoriety of being published by a serious media. In the vast majority of cases though, those "non-professional" experts happened to know a lot more on their subject than journalists with a hobby. They were not the best writers though, but their articles could be reviewed and corrected by internal staff, then published. In the end, you got a much better article written by a passionate individual in the know, and costing much less. If you're the boss, what would you do?

I have a friend who owes an helicopter. He used to have a TV show where he would present some interesting regions from above. Well... His net cost to keep his 350K$ helicopter in the air for say half a day, is about the same as buying a high-end drone with 4K recording capabilities. When you consider that you can hire any 15 years old kid who got a drone for Christmas, pay him 100$ a day, and get all the aerial footage you want... Of course, my pilot friend is no longer producing his TV show...

Being a book writer is also a huge challenge today. Very few succeed, and you have to be very persistant if you want to be published, especially if it's your first book. Or, you can publish yourself if no one wants your book.

What about cinema and movies? Almost the same... Remember the Blair Witch Project movie? While only the big studios can afford to produce movies like Star Wars, The Lord of the RIng and the Hobbit Trilogy, you do have individual filmmakers that are producing interesting movies with very little means. Remember Fede Alvarez with his short "Ataque de Panico!"? I would not want those guys to be weeded out of the movie landscape. I spend a lot of hours watching videos on Vimeo, and I'm always pleasantly surprised to see that there is so much talent out there.

As you can see, this is an entirely new world of opportunities. The more pessimistic of us may see it as the good old days are gone because the content we get to see today is no longer controlled and filtered by big corporations and medias providing excellent working conditions. Of course, if you were a highly paid worker in these corporations, and happened to take it easy in the years before you got fired, you're probably not in the right mind set to appreciate what is done today by people with a fraction of the means you use to have. Well folks, party's over...

The optimistic people though are truly excited by today's technology. If you are passionate and talented, and you know what you are doing, well, there will be no freakin corporate idiot who will tell you that your ideas suck and refuse to produce your work. You can get it done yourself, and have the freedom of proving them all wrong. Let the public be the judge... This is exactly what is getting me going nowadays. We will see talented people emerging from nowhere because they can do it, not because someone in a big corporation decided for myself that they were worth seeing...

Of course, a lot of "pros" are in for a very rough ride nowadays, as it's getting real hard to distinguish yourself from the crowd, but it happened in the past... I beleive though that we need to focus our attention couple years ahead, and see where our industry is going if we still want to make money out of photography in the future.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom