Montana
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 1,533
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Eastern Montana
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I know that the obvious answer is no, but surely they are rated for less than they can hold...right? I mean most weight ratings in this world can be grossly exceeded without harm or damage, but as a safety (see..cover our hind-ends) factor manufacturers place these consevative ratings on their products.
So, here is my delema.....
With my tax return, I have plans (and asked the wife for permission) to purchase a Canon 600mm f/4. Also, a wimberly gimble head and arca-swiss style plate designed for the long telephoto lenses.
This equipment along with my Canon 40D w/grip will "possibly" be mounted on my Bogen/Manfrotto 055MF3 tripod.
Now, here is the delema. The tripod is rated for 15.4 pounds. The total weight of my equipment will be roughly 18 pounds. But my tripod is carbon fiber and I am sure its not the legs that are rated for 15.4, but perhaps the leg locks? And I am assuming that the weight rating is with the tripod fully extended as well. What if only one leg section is pulled out, leaving the smaller/weaker sections unused?
Would any of you folks risk it? I know some may be thinking....if you can afford that lens, then you can afford the tripod too. Well, yes and no. I have longed for the 600mm forever, and suddenly have the means to purchase, but all these additional costs are really adding up. (head, plate, etc)
Bottom line, risk it or sell and buy different tripod?
Derrick
So, here is my delema.....
With my tax return, I have plans (and asked the wife for permission) to purchase a Canon 600mm f/4. Also, a wimberly gimble head and arca-swiss style plate designed for the long telephoto lenses.
This equipment along with my Canon 40D w/grip will "possibly" be mounted on my Bogen/Manfrotto 055MF3 tripod.
Now, here is the delema. The tripod is rated for 15.4 pounds. The total weight of my equipment will be roughly 18 pounds. But my tripod is carbon fiber and I am sure its not the legs that are rated for 15.4, but perhaps the leg locks? And I am assuming that the weight rating is with the tripod fully extended as well. What if only one leg section is pulled out, leaving the smaller/weaker sections unused?
Would any of you folks risk it? I know some may be thinking....if you can afford that lens, then you can afford the tripod too. Well, yes and no. I have longed for the 600mm forever, and suddenly have the means to purchase, but all these additional costs are really adding up. (head, plate, etc)
Bottom line, risk it or sell and buy different tripod?
Derrick