visprod
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2013
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- India
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I use a Nikon D3100 with the Nikon-mount Tamron 70-300mm VC lens. In addition, I have the Nikon 18-55mm lens and a Nikon 50mm f1.8.
I am planning to buy a Sigma 150-500mm OS lens for birding. This is where my confusion begins. I browsed through photo-sharing websites like 500px for photographs taken with the Sigma 150-500mm OS. I found that the photos taken with the Sigma mounted on a Canon body were better than the ones taken with the lens mounted on a Nikon body. Even otherwise, I have found the photos taken with the Canon having better contrast and colour, in my opinion.
However, all the forums invariably state that Nikon and Canon are equally good, and it is the photographer and his techniques that determine the quality of the images. Yet I find the majority of bird photographers using Canon. Could you please throw some light on this aspect?
Also, I read somewhere that Nikon sensors have inbuilt infrared filters that cutoff infrared rays, the downside being that some image detail is also lost, whereas Canon does not have this. How credible is this information?
Finally, it all boils down to this. I need to know if I should switch over to Canon or stay with the Nikon. If I have to switch over to Canon, I'll have to sell all my equipment, including the body and the Tamron 70-300 and buy a Canon-mount Sigma 150-500mm and Canon 60D. On the other hand, if I buy a Nikon-mount Sigma 150-500mm, I can have all the equipment I already have, and later buy a Nikon D7000.
Which option should I choose?
I am planning to buy a Sigma 150-500mm OS lens for birding. This is where my confusion begins. I browsed through photo-sharing websites like 500px for photographs taken with the Sigma 150-500mm OS. I found that the photos taken with the Sigma mounted on a Canon body were better than the ones taken with the lens mounted on a Nikon body. Even otherwise, I have found the photos taken with the Canon having better contrast and colour, in my opinion.
However, all the forums invariably state that Nikon and Canon are equally good, and it is the photographer and his techniques that determine the quality of the images. Yet I find the majority of bird photographers using Canon. Could you please throw some light on this aspect?
Also, I read somewhere that Nikon sensors have inbuilt infrared filters that cutoff infrared rays, the downside being that some image detail is also lost, whereas Canon does not have this. How credible is this information?
Finally, it all boils down to this. I need to know if I should switch over to Canon or stay with the Nikon. If I have to switch over to Canon, I'll have to sell all my equipment, including the body and the Tamron 70-300 and buy a Canon-mount Sigma 150-500mm and Canon 60D. On the other hand, if I buy a Nikon-mount Sigma 150-500mm, I can have all the equipment I already have, and later buy a Nikon D7000.
Which option should I choose?