Cheap super long focal length (1500mm!!)

Marc-Etienne

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
463
Reaction score
7
Location
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
I wanted to share this idea with other poor photographers that would love to shoot with super long focal length lens, but can't afford a 10K$ lens. I got myself this big boy last year in a outdoor shop in Québec city for around 600$:D. It a Sky-Watcher Equinox 80mm x 500mm. It has a focal length of 500mm (35mm equivalent, so 750mm on my D90).

DSC_0001.JPG

DSC_0003.JPG


It's not as good as a pro prime lens, but it can satisfy a poor outdoor enthusiast. Its very good quality glass made for astronomical observation and very strong construction. It catches sooooo much light, it almost become a problem some time. Shooting mid-day, I often have to shoot with a shutter speed of 1/1000s to 1/2000s to avoid having over exposed pictures. On the bright side however, it allows you to shoot in low light situation like in a covered situation (in the forest), where I shoot around 1/200s to 1/100s (like the last shot took at night!) which is still reasonable.

Two down sides that need to be known (but easy to dealt with). Since it's a telescope, you don't have any diaphragm (no aperture control) and it's a fully manual lens, so you got to be quick to focus (and shoot hundreds of pictures for a good one like a do;)). To give you an idea of what I managed to do with my steel monster, here are a few examples. The following birds pictures were taken at a focal length of 750mm (500m 35 mm equivalent):

Pris%20au%20pi%C3%A8ge.JPG

Shutter : 1/3200s

DSC_0100.jpg

Shutter : 1/800s

DSC_0209.jpg

Shutter : 1/100s (very cloudy day)

This picture is an example of one of my last upgrade. I got a 2X manual teleconverter for real cheap and added it to the telescope to achieve a massive focal length of 1500mm (1000mm 35mm equivalent). This is a untouched (no PP) picture, not even cropping. It gives you a idea of the focal length!
Dsc_0059.jpg

Shutter : 1/100s

To all of those like me that love to do wildlife photography that are stuck with short focal length lens, I recommend it! Than do like me, save your money and get a Sigma 150mm-500mm :D, Come on mail man, faster!!!:lmao:
 
heh i tried doing that but all pics where useless; my telescope was a cheapo 80$ one, now thats probably the lowest quality lens ever. :)
 
heh i tried doing that but all pics where useless; my telescope was a cheapo 80$ one, now thats probably the lowest quality lens ever. :)

Probably it didn't help. It's worth it to get a good telescope. At the same time, you can get an eye piece use it for astronomy and spotting scope for wildlife. The posted pictures are very little post-processed or not post-processed at all. It gives you an idea of what I manage with a good telescope. Keep in mind that 600$ is still 15 times less than the Nikkor equivalent (not the same quality, but a good part of the fun!:D)
 
LOL yeah This has been done for a while. I shot astrophotography 10 years ago and used a 2000mm ( 10" ) reflector. I could shoot a golf ball from a football field away. Only issue is you wont get tack sharp images. Manual focus of course. But hey it is still fun.
 
I'm not reinventing anything for sure, but I thought it could give noobs like me ideas to work around their tight budget. I also wanted to show that it could satisfy basic amateur needs and help you learn the basics of wildlife photography without 10K$ lens all this with a good astronomical telescope.
 
LOL yeah This has been done for a while. I shot astrophotography 10 years ago and used a 2000mm ( 10" ) reflector. I could shoot a golf ball from a football field away. Only issue is you wont get tack sharp images. Manual focus of course. But hey it is still fun.
Hey not to change the OP's subject. anyone? I have been intrested in astrophotography. can you point me to a good tracking system I can mount my camera onto? or websites? equipment? Beginners packs? i could have about 1k but would like to do it cheaper :) I have seen amazing results with the 200mm canon 2.8l on a tracker. nebuli and crap with good detail really. I have a 300mm.
I want to add too that i have been concidering a 400mm f/4 canon. heard great things. Dont know if this is a dooable way to go.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that's awsome. Could I mount a camera directly on that?
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top