What's new

Couple Nature Landscapes

Joined
Jun 14, 2013
Messages
4,030
Reaction score
1,482
Location
Oklahoma
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
I realize that landscape is not everyone's bag, but it is my favorite thing to shoot! It is so tranquil and peaceful out there, I enjoy it more than all other areas of photography combined. Now, if I can just make some progress!


$MtScott.webp


$QuanahParker.webp


$Prairie.webp


Thanks for looking!
 
I thought those storm clouds in #1 might backbuild somewhat, adding some drama to it. Didn't happen. Almost didn't post that one.
 
If you had took the shot in in brackets and used HDR you could force that drama. As it is, its kinda plain processing. This comes from a photographer that uses to camera to create, not capture what is there. Its all on what your intent is.
 
If you had took the shot in in brackets and used HDR you could force that drama.

Well, I did and i did. Just not enough, I guess.
What prog are you using for hdr?

Photomatix 5 and tonight I did try the Nik export to hdr, just not sure which one of the 3 it was. I'd have to look tomorrow. I do try not to make them overly done or cooked crisp. All shots are 7 images +-3ev, then exported to usually Photomatix.
 
Photomatix is my least favorite of em. PS and HDR expose 3 do the most realistic jobs. NIK hdr can, but can take alot of work.

Heres an example:

View attachment 75446


Thats nik hdr, nik silver effects, and some luminosity masks.
 
I like landscape...you should do some more of these or similar...I like #2 and 3 best between all of them. #1 is somewhat so-so I think but the composition on all of them is great, according to me whereas #2 and #3 the clouds were there and very present.

Were these taken with your new gears?
 
Thanks for sharing. I too am a big landscape and cityscape fan. Let me offer a little C&C:
1. General composition rule for landscapes and sunrise/set shots--don't put the horizon squarely in the middle of the frame. For all 3 shots you're almost in the middle or pretty close to it. That creates tension for the viewer's eye--they can't subconsciously decide if they're supposed to look in the distance or the foreground. So as a photographer, take a stand. Say in the photo "I think you should be looking at the sky" or "the foreground is where it's at in this shot" and emphasize that in the photo.
2. Watch the perception of how level the shot is. To my "eye", #1 and #3 seem slightly a kilter. I suspect it's b/c of the terrain in #1 (it appears to rise to the right but creates the perception your photo isn't level). With #3, it's the road (the only straight line in the photo) which is probably on rising ground but again throws the photo out of balance.
3. Here's a suggestion a much smarter/better photographer gave me once about taking landscapes. He said "don't take a picture--create a picture of that scene." I suspect he was paraphrasing Ansel Adams. But the point is this: we go someplace and go "Wow.....!" when a scene takes our breath away so we pull out the camera and snap a shot. It's in focus, WB is accurate but it just doesn't have the same "Wow" factor or pizazz. So maybe we saturate it or add HDR. His point to me was that your camera doesn't see the same thing that your eye sees. So to have a picture that creates the same impression that it had in person calls for us to "create the picture." For instance, for #1, I suspect part of what grabbed you (besides the potential storm clouds) was the perspective, the size and vista. So either get down at a lower angle (which should emphasize the high ground) or aim higher (removing much of the foreground so we see more sky and the amount of space and size of it all jumps out at us and gob-smacks us in the face). Yes, leave some foreground so we have perspective but use angle or sky to emphasize how big the setting is. Or find an object (like a human, a car, a horse, a house) that adds perspective that allows us to think "holly crap that's freaking BIG...look how tiny that human is." The point is, for great landscapes, don't have "captures" but instead have "creations" b/c you manipulate how you set up the shot or compose the picture. Thus it has the same impact in viewing that you got standing there in person.
 
Thanks, Joe. Good information and I'm writing cliff notes.

Izzie, yes, taken with the new 5DIII and 24-70L II, with a CPL on the front.

Benjamin, I'm also contemplating going with the $9.99 special for Adobe's CC, or picking up Elements 12.
 
I think the bottom of the clouds in #3 is a little too dark for a beautiful sunny day, and there are dark rings around those clouds too. I think the photo would be better if there's less of those in the clouds. Just my 2c.
 
I love landscapes for the same reason you do. I feel alive and enjoy the beauty of it. Your shots are of pretty areas that could be improved in better light like after sunrise and before sunset -the magic hours. As they are, the scene's contrast and colors are flat because you shot in the middle of the day. I know it's hard, but try waiting and planning for better light.

Also, there's too much uninteresting foreground of water and grass in all of them. Sometimes, a wide scene just doesn't have a main element to focus on. You might have to move in or use a telephoto to find some interesting smaller detail in the landscape to shoot. Good luck and keep shooting.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom