tr0gd0o0r said:
I'd agree limiting both one picture per post ..... Also I think a sticky that has guidlines for a critique may be helpful
while i'm here sipping a beer, i'll chime in on this topic.
i think the purpose of the
want of critique is get an opinion of the photographic eye, NOT the photograph. there's a difference.
'i like the reds and the texture of the boards is really cool'
'the reds are nice, but overpower the photo as they take up the majority of the frame. the texture of the boards is a nice detail. i think that moving them to the left a bit would balance the photo a bit more. you may want to try rating x-brand film at ei-n; you'll find the shadows are much more defined.'
big difference.
a true critique is feedback on the vision, process, etc. of the photographer exemplified in a photograph.
that said, the reason i've stopped posting is because i ASK for critique and a few do critique, but then it gets lost in the 'look what i did' posts. those that obsess over a photograph, working on it for hours until it strikes the right chord and want critique , well, they want critique because they are willing to invest hours more back into that photograph if need be.
i agree with the one image per post thought for reasons aforementioned. i would've welcomed days of critique on the last two posts that i made simply because i
can't afford to live in my head only. i need the opinions of others.
further to this, a knowledge base is in the making when serious, varied critiques are posted.