Most are really nice, well exposed snap shots. The only ones that I would call a solid photographs are the re-cropped rabbit, and the snapper, which is extremely well done. Hope you can see the difference, and understand what I'm tryin gto point out.
I welcome the input. I am a little surprised at the term 'snapshot' (except for the owl shot, that was an attempt at humor) being used with these shots, but if it fits it fits.
The bison shot I thought was a solid shot, with the foreground sharp leading through the subject to a slight BG blur to isolate the subject, without loosing the herd in the BG. Thought the framing was correct as well.
Could be that I am blinded by all the PP work that I did on it, I normally don't bring that up, because it is the final image that is important not all the work that it took to create. The whole walking through snow, up hill, both ways, with my little sister on my back bit
One of the things that concerns me is there is a common tendency on every forum that I have been a member of, and that is it seems that people are afraid to point out flaws in other people photos. Many times I do not comment on a photo because there are five comments already saying what a great shot it is, when it is blurry or burned out or has some other glaring problem. Then there are the people that get hurt if you make suggestions on how to improve the shot.
It's the image. I welcome feedback, it is important, especially when the photographer thinks that the shots are good solid shots (like in this thread) and they are not.
Please keep it up.
This is the un-prosessed shot of the bison.