TBH there's nothing i like about the frist one but i love the second one, very nice colour & reflections.
Where about in NZ are you from?
Thanks stev, not so keen on the first one either really, hence I will have another go, getting some good ideas from the posts here.
Im in Papamoa, and you?
I really like both nice pics
Thanks jackie
I really like the second one. The reflections are great and the light is lovely.
I don't like the first one. To me, it looks like you took a picture of a bunch of rocks and there just happens to be a Maori warrior in the background; rather than focusing on the Maori warrior and the foreground leading the eye to the statue. Maybe try being a bit closer? Would that be possible at low tide?
Good points, should be able to get over to the small sandbar at low tide.
i like the second one. the masts make it a bit busy but the water is so calm. kind of a good mix of both.
thanks
I don't like the first one. To me, it looks like you took a picture of a bunch of rocks and there just happens to be a Maori warrior in the background; rather than focusing on the Maori warrior and the foreground leading the eye to the statue. Maybe try being a bit closer? Would that be possible at low tide?
Exactly! You could also try stepping back and framing it with a normal or short tele (space permitting of course) instead of a wide angle. That would even up the perceived sizes of the rocks and the statue.
Agreed, will post the reshoot here when I do it, thanks for the idea's, I have been struggling with this subject for months now, it's a shot I want to get but because of its location and the way the warrior is facing it seems to be eluding me. Sometimes you just have to work that little bit harder.
The second one is absolutely stunning!
I don't feel the large amount of masts makes it too busy. Because there are so many and they're so close together I feel like they're 1 entity in the picture. The colours and reflections are just...wow.
thanks
The first one would be improved by setting your focus @ infinity & shooting @ f11. That would require you to up the ISO from 100 as this one was shot.
Yeah I kinda screwed up there Ron, I was doing test shots at the wider aperture for compostion and once set I did forget to stop it down :er:, camera was tripod mounted so ISO 100 isnt an issue. Actually your the 2nd one to point out the aperture setting, the first guy noticed that area being softer, it wasnt until you pointed it out as well that I actually double checked the aperture setting f/3.5!!!!!
The rest of the shots from that night were in the f/7-11 range, when wide on the 18-55mm.
#1 looks like someone did a bad HDR job, but I think you could improve it by adjusting the colour tones.
But the 2nd one is really really sweet. I love it. Bravo. :thumbup:
Correct, it is a bad HDR job, but its not the HDR thats at issue, its my processing, just seeing if I could recover a fairly meh shot with a bit of bling post HDR (even the HDR is very flat with little colour, as shot), the feedback I am getting from you guys is awesome, because it confirms my own suspicions. Thanks for your input. The 2nd one is the one I was really not sure about.
great pics.
#2 the clouds on the right look awesome just like if the sky were on fire. pretty cool.
Thanks, the clouds are vapour plumes from a fertiliser plant, lucky theyre in the shot I think, they give the sky some much needed interest.