Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No and No.Do Fisheye Prime lenses need IS? Will it make a big difference?
No and No.Do Fisheye Prime lenses need IS? Will it make a big difference?
Image Stabilization generally needs to be turned off.
Good camera holding technique usually suffices instead of IS/VR/OS etc until lens focal length goes beyound 200 mm.
This is a completely arbitrary cutoff and statement that makes assumptions about shutter speed that are not necessarily true for a given person's shooting style.Good camera holding technique usually suffices instead of IS/VR/OS etc until lens focal length goes beyound 200 mm.
The reason both of these are popular lenses has more to do with the usefulness of this zoom range for sports. If you're shooting sports with very in-motion subjects, then IS isn't very useful, because IS doesn't freeze subject motion, only hand shake. So why waste money on IS you would never use? Same goes for studio portraits, where you control the light to be as bright as it needs to be for the shutter speed you like.I'm asking about the 70-200mm f/2.8 vs f/2.8 IS. I'm thinking about getting primes, since the optical performance is amazing on a lot of them.
Thanks for the info!
Do you use primes or zooms?
I'm a little bit confused.People have a distressing tendency to think of sharpness-enhancing things as not doing anything after a certain point.
It's not true. Sharpness-adding-things (tripods, IS, faster shutter speeds, better lenses, more pixels, etc etc etc) always add sharpness, except when they're removing sharpness. IS systems are a little problematic since they can take sharpness away as well as adding it.
Sometimes they're adding negligible amounts of sharpness, but unless they're in some mode where they're actually taking sharpness away, they're adding it.
Which ones?Thanks for the info!
Do you use primes or zooms?
Both.
Each with a purpose, if you don't mind
How many do you bring when you travel?Which ones?Both.
Each with a purpose, if you don't mind
My stable of lenses:
Peleng 8mm (circular fisheye) - for when life is viewed through a circle.
Nikkor 10.5mm (full-frame fisheye) - for when I want to get 'the whole picture'.
Tokina 17/3.5 SL - Dedicated for mast photography when shooting tethered.
Nikkor 17-35 2.8D (ultra-wide zoom) - For my 'serious work' requiring an ultrawide.
Nikkor 24-85 3.5-4.5G ('standard' zoom) - For my 'serious work' requiring 'normal' focal lengths.
Nikkor 24-200 3.5-5.6D ('street' zoom) - My 'walk-about, or 'street' lens.
Nikkor 28/2.8Ai - Dedicated for reversing on bellows for macro work.
Nikkor 50/1.8 D - for low-light shooting, all-around lens, and when sharpness is critical.
Nikkor 105 2.8D (Micro) - For short tele work, portraiture, and obviously macro work.
Nikkor 70-300 G (tele-zoom) - Sports, candids, street shooting.
Nikkor 500/8 N (Long tele) - Sports, wildlife.
Sigma 600/8 (Longer tele) - Sports, wildlife.
Celestron 2000/8 (Very long tele) - Astro, wildlife, and........ he he....'wild life'.
Only two (24-85 and 70-300) have VR, and I rarely turn it on.