End the Canon/Nikon debate once and for all??? (Part 2)

Sharkbait · Nov 7, 2004

Another test for you.

Canon 300d, Nikon D70, or scanned film print (PS work to convert to b&w, crop to panorama format, add grain and slightly soften focus for effect.)?

DocFrankenstein · Nov 7, 2004

What? You want to soften it, downscale it and make it black and white...

Nobody can tell you that....

But if you shot raw, printed it on a nice 13*19... upsampled...

Then it would show and the truth would be revealed! :lol:

Sharkbait · Nov 7, 2004

Actually I have this matted in a 20x30 frame in our bedroom.

DocFrankenstein · Nov 7, 2004

Doesn't help me much if you have it in your bedroom.

When comparing full size pics from dpreview I could see more noise in D70. In here you might as well put up post size pics and ask us what it was shot with.

Unscientific.

Sharkbait · Nov 7, 2004

I disagree, at least for the purpose of our debates here. Most of the people that are debating the 'canon-sucks/nikon-sucks' issue will rarely, if ever make poster-sized prints of their photos.

DocFrankenstein · Nov 7, 2004

Point made.

Trig · Nov 7, 2004

That is a Fantastic photo. So amazing. Has someone bought it off you? I wouldn't be surprised if some local gov. magazine has.

Sharkbait · Nov 9, 2004

Here're the current results of this poll:

Nikon D70
16%
16% [ 2 ]
Canon 300d
58%
58% [ 7 ]
Scanned film print
25%
25% [ 3 ]

This one was the one really designed to take the cake. This photo was taken about 6 years ago with a $15 point-and-shoot film camera. Proof positive that it's not about the camera!