- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 15,474
- Reaction score
- 7,859
- Location
- Central Florida
- Website
- www.flickr.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I have been asked what the decision making process is like for our donations, and why we do not make it like a lottery with a random drawing.
The answer to the second question is simple. Because this is how we want to do it. We feel our process gives the donation a very personal touch, and while this makes it anything but impartial, its not a process we are likely to change. (to those that appear to feel that this is unfair, we are sorry these donations are not to your liking)
The first question is a little more complicated, and there really isn't any specific "checklist" scoring system where we assign points for certain things and the person with the most points wins. But... we do look at the criteria I list in the donation post and grade the interested parties based on how they responded and their forum activity. It basically comes down to me and wife looking at a few things.
1: forum activity. this one probably carries the most weight. we don't base this one on post counts, but we do peruse the interested parties recent activity and postings (which anyone can do by clicking on a persons name and appropriate tab) and
see how (and how often) they have been interacting with the forum. this criteria is definitely quality over quantity, and like most of the donation process, completely subjective.
2: Need before Greed. (I don't mean greed in a derogatory sense, its an old gaming term) this is a tough category, and it is why we ask for a full gear list from applicants. I mean, its basically the honor system, so we have to trust that people are being honest with their equipment list and don't just want something to have a backup. we arent exactly donating high end equipment, but as a possible example... if your gear list is 10k in equipment,we would take that into consideration vs someone with 1k in equipment. we also ask for a gear list because we want to know that you are capable of actually making use of whatever we are donating now and not just trying to stock up for later.
3: your actual post. Here's where we surprisingly have to disqualify at least one person in almost every donation (not all though). in every donation post, I list specific things that must be done to qualify. we don't ask for much, and I do allow just a little leeway if I see there was actual effort made to comply with the rules. (we understand language differences might cause some difficulties) but the people that are unable or unwilling to read through the OP and post accordingly do not even make it to my wife's review process. This part is pretty subjective as well, but we feel that since we are giving something away and covering the shipping cost, its not too much to ask that someone take a few minutes to explain why they want it and how it will help them.
This is the part that seems to draw the most criticism for some reason, and a thus we have, in the past, considered confining this part to PM or email. ultimately though, we decided that it was better to keep everything out in the open where everyone could see the entirety of the donation from start to finish without having to wonder what was going on in private discussion.
everyone can see the same information that we see when we make our decision.
anyways....that's basically the process in a nutshell.
when I decide that enough time has passed, me and the wife look at all those things, and when we come to consensus, I make the announcement. I hope that satisfactorily answers the question, and I encourage anyone else with questions or concerns to PM me. I promise to answer as thoroughly and honestly as possible as well as leaving you anonymous.
The answer to the second question is simple. Because this is how we want to do it. We feel our process gives the donation a very personal touch, and while this makes it anything but impartial, its not a process we are likely to change. (to those that appear to feel that this is unfair, we are sorry these donations are not to your liking)
The first question is a little more complicated, and there really isn't any specific "checklist" scoring system where we assign points for certain things and the person with the most points wins. But... we do look at the criteria I list in the donation post and grade the interested parties based on how they responded and their forum activity. It basically comes down to me and wife looking at a few things.
1: forum activity. this one probably carries the most weight. we don't base this one on post counts, but we do peruse the interested parties recent activity and postings (which anyone can do by clicking on a persons name and appropriate tab) and
see how (and how often) they have been interacting with the forum. this criteria is definitely quality over quantity, and like most of the donation process, completely subjective.
2: Need before Greed. (I don't mean greed in a derogatory sense, its an old gaming term) this is a tough category, and it is why we ask for a full gear list from applicants. I mean, its basically the honor system, so we have to trust that people are being honest with their equipment list and don't just want something to have a backup. we arent exactly donating high end equipment, but as a possible example... if your gear list is 10k in equipment,we would take that into consideration vs someone with 1k in equipment. we also ask for a gear list because we want to know that you are capable of actually making use of whatever we are donating now and not just trying to stock up for later.
3: your actual post. Here's where we surprisingly have to disqualify at least one person in almost every donation (not all though). in every donation post, I list specific things that must be done to qualify. we don't ask for much, and I do allow just a little leeway if I see there was actual effort made to comply with the rules. (we understand language differences might cause some difficulties) but the people that are unable or unwilling to read through the OP and post accordingly do not even make it to my wife's review process. This part is pretty subjective as well, but we feel that since we are giving something away and covering the shipping cost, its not too much to ask that someone take a few minutes to explain why they want it and how it will help them.
This is the part that seems to draw the most criticism for some reason, and a thus we have, in the past, considered confining this part to PM or email. ultimately though, we decided that it was better to keep everything out in the open where everyone could see the entirety of the donation from start to finish without having to wonder what was going on in private discussion.
everyone can see the same information that we see when we make our decision.
anyways....that's basically the process in a nutshell.
when I decide that enough time has passed, me and the wife look at all those things, and when we come to consensus, I make the announcement. I hope that satisfactorily answers the question, and I encourage anyone else with questions or concerns to PM me. I promise to answer as thoroughly and honestly as possible as well as leaving you anonymous.