Glove and broken shadow by Pascal Riben

[pascalriben]

Seoul, Sud Korea - Click on the picture!

 

[DiskoJoe]

So how much do you make from advertisiers for each hit?

 

[pascalriben]

So how much do you make from advertisiers for each hit?

? Sorry, I didn't understand...

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

:roll:

 

[DiskoJoe]

:roll:

I had to poke the bear.

 

[pixmedic]

one last warning folks, and this is it.
back the **** off this pascal thing.

if you dont like how he interacts on the forum, don't open his threads, or put him on ignore.

 

[Juga]

I like the shadow but otherwise, to me, the photo isn't very interesting with the glove having no real merit on the overall photo.

 

[mishele]

I see the point of the shot. Your shadow is interesting. It's a little bit like a hidden picture.

 

[kathyt]

I think the main subject looks overexposed, and the overall image is soft. The car in the backround is distracting.

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

Depends what you consider the "main subject". To me the main subject is triangles. So many freaking triangles!
I disagree about the car being a distraction. I looked at this several times, and never noticed the car. What I did notice was the dappled sunlight forms it's own triangle, across the car, and behind the girl.

So. Many. Triangles!
It almost seems kaleidoscopic, and I get wonderously lost in it.

 

[pascalriben]

It's a little bit like a hidden picture.

Thank you for your comment mishele: I'm so shy :blush2:

 

[pascalriben]

I think the main subject looks overexposed, and the overall image is soft. The car in the backround is distracting.

Thank you for your comment kathythorson. I'm sorry, but I disagree with everything: the main subject - my shadow - isn't overexposed, but the "white" girl isn't too - nothing is burn, I can't find the image soft and the car is not distracting in this kind of picture.

 

[pascalriben]

Depends what you consider the "main subject". To me the main subject is triangles. So many freaking triangles!
I disagree about the car being a distraction. I looked at this several times, and never noticed the car. What I did notice was the dappled sunlight forms it's own triangle, across the car, and behind the girl.

So. Many. Triangles!
It almost seems kaleidoscopic, and I get wonderously lost in it.

Thank you for your comment Bitter.

 

[kathyt]

I think the main subject looks overexposed, and the overall image is soft. The car in the backround is distracting.

Thank you for your comment kathythorson. I'm sorry, but I disagree with everything: the main subject - my shadow - isn't overexposed, but the "white" girl isn't too - nothing is burn, I can't find the image soft and the car is not distracting in this kind of picture.

Alrighty then. I guess it is a stunning masterpiece. Hey, I tried.

 

[mishele]

I think the main subject looks overexposed, and the overall image is soft. The car in the backround is distracting.

Thank you for your comment kathythorson. I'm sorry, but I disagree with everything: the main subject - my shadow - isn't overexposed, but the "white" girl isn't too - nothing is burn, I can't find the image soft and the car is not distracting in this kind of picture.

Alrighty then. I guess it is a stunning masterpiece.

Is it possible even if all those things were accurate that it wouldn't matter. The reason the shot works is beyond technical perfection. You might have to take a little deeper look at it.