I really need to agree with ffarl about his conceptions regarding photography and its translation into the food industry. Having been a chef for 16 years, and now operating as a professional photographer, there really are a lot of compromises that must be made in each field in order to survive. Just because YOU don't like it, doesn't mean the customer doesn't. At the end of the day, as far as selling photography goes, you have to do what the customer wants, even if you, the photographer, don't care for it. Also, you do what they want so that you get the return business. It's all about keeping bills paid and mouths fed. And yes. It IS about making money, and yes, that does often include selling your artistic sense short, but any business out there is set up for one reason. TO MAKE MONEY! I've done quite a few things for clients that I'm not exactly happy with, but it's what they wanted, so hey...bills got paid for a month. Had I not gone with what the customer want and they hated it? Yep. Refund, and bills don't get paid. That's the nature of business. Anyone who assumes they get to keep all their "artistic freedom" when going into business for him or herself are deluding themselves. Yes, the photographer retains a control point, but really, it's "what the client wants, the client gets", and hey. If you don't want to do what the client wants, you don't get to eat or pay your bills till you can wake up, smell the coffee, and shake out those cobwebs of "It's my business, so it's my way". Yeah...stop kidding yourselves and turn off the open sign. Photographers are paid for a service, much like a tattoo artist. How many tattoos do you think any given artist has made, but since it's what the customer wanted, it's what they got? Is someone so naive that they'd think that just because a design sucks that someone wants done, they'd turn that client away? Same difference.