Redeyejedi
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 161
- Reaction score
- 17
- Location
- Los Angeles, California
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
wrong reply
pls del
pls del
It was explained in the thread already. Feel free to refresh yourself by reading it.OP specifically said that is NOT what he is trying to do.
i don't get where you get that from this:
Good grief man. Would you just go to the link I provided and get yourself a clue?OP wanted star shapes. Why spend money on something that you can create by shooting at say f/14 for free?
Then, let it go. You were mistaken. No big deal.
Thank you for your opinion. It won't give the results the OP was looking for though, and that's sort of the whole idea.It was explained in the thread already. Feel free to refresh yourself by reading it.i don't get where you get that from this:
Good grief man. Would you just go to the link I provided and get yourself a clue?OP wanted star shapes. Why spend money on something that you can create by shooting at say f/14 for free?
Then, let it go. You were mistaken. No big deal.
Must be a case of two nations divided by a common language then. Because to me using a small aperture will get far more pleasing results. JMHO of course
Of course.Thank you for your opinion. It won't give the results the OP was looking for though, and that's sort of the whole idea.It was explained in the thread already. Feel free to refresh yourself by reading it.
Good grief man. Would you just go to the link I provided and get yourself a clue?
Then, let it go. You were mistaken. No big deal.
Must be a case of two nations divided by a common language then. Because to me using a small aperture will get far more pleasing results. JMHO of course
Here's a wild thought: Sometimes people want to throw their backgrounds OOF, AND they want the resulting bokeh to have some sort of fun shape to it. In a case like that (this OP in this thread, btw) stopping down the lens would not be a valid solution.
You do understand DOF, right?