Get over it. The EXIF fever is a newbie disease that's worse than the cure. There is no direct "correlation" to settings and good photos. There exists a wide range of settings that can provide outstanding photos. There is NO, I repeat NO, magic bullet, no magic way to set a camera. It's akin to focusing on the knives a chef uses, and then totally ignoring the entire manner in which the food is prepared. It's a lot like thinking that a certain font, with a certain leading, and a certain page margin setup, will somehow magically lead to "great writing". Sorry. Doesn't work that way.
Yes, EXIF data can be of some use, but fixating on it, and attempting to "figure out what settings correlate to good photos" is a common mistake. Learning to "see" light, and lighting, is much more critical than attempting to correlate EXIF data with "good photos". "Good photos" are not comprised of EXIF data..."good photos" are made by people who use a camera skillfully.
It would probably be better to focus your energy and efforts on learning the "why" and the "what for" that underlies photography, rather than focusing and obsessing on raw data from OTHER peoples' images. It'sa lot like looking at famous movie actors and thinking, "Gosh, I wish I looked like him." You don't, and you never will.And you still have to make your own way in the world.