usayit
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2003
- Messages
- 9,521
- Reaction score
- 347
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Just a note.... Until recently, HP has not had an archival quality ink marketed. Perhaps, your experience is proof of that fact. HP now has the 8450 which uses their new Vivera ink set which is archival and reviewed by Wilhelm. I have personal problems with HP's consumer line of products so I didn't consider that printer.
I too ended up with the 2200 and my thoughts are here:
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29325
The 2200 is very good with B&W prints. It has a dedicated light black and black ink cartridges. For the black cartridge, you can either use Photo black or matte black which is forumulated for either glossy or matte finished papers. Note. the R1800 and R2400 use different ink sets from the 2200 which is not totally apparent in their market material. For example, the R1800 is listed as an 8 color printer.. but it only really prints 6 real colors at a time. In my opinion, for archival matte color and B&W prints the 2200 is still superior to the R1800. For glossy, the "finisher" cartridge gives the edge to R1800 but I almost never print glossy.
I too ended up with the 2200 and my thoughts are here:
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29325
The 2200 is very good with B&W prints. It has a dedicated light black and black ink cartridges. For the black cartridge, you can either use Photo black or matte black which is forumulated for either glossy or matte finished papers. Note. the R1800 and R2400 use different ink sets from the 2200 which is not totally apparent in their market material. For example, the R1800 is listed as an 8 color printer.. but it only really prints 6 real colors at a time. In my opinion, for archival matte color and B&W prints the 2200 is still superior to the R1800. For glossy, the "finisher" cartridge gives the edge to R1800 but I almost never print glossy.