The whole "How many Watt-seconds do I need? " answer for single-person portrait shots (head shots, bust, or half-body shots) with the camera at ISO 1-- to 320 is, "Probably not as many Watt-second as you might think." I took this two-light, one reflector portrait using two lights, each one with 100 Watt-seconds of light. The main light is camera right, and is a Photoflex 36 x 48 inch softbox just off to the right of the subject. The hair and separation light for the shoulder is an identical Speedotron Brown Line M11 light unit, with a deep-dish, 11.5 inch grid reflector that throws a 50 degree beam spread on its own, but fitted with a snap-in 20-degree honeycomb grid, so it would put out a very much toned-down, softer, more-directional light. I added a set of 2-way barndoors to this light, and also added a Speedotron snap-on mylar diffuser. The combo of the grid reflector, plus the 20 degree grid put in place AND the milk-jug-like, tough mylar diffuser in front, and the barn doors, allowed me to aim the light right at her shoulder and hair from about 8 feet back.
Now, normally, at 8 feet, with 100 Watt-seconds, a big parabolic reflector like this would create REALLY "hot" light that would totally,totally blow out the hair and shoulder; but the grid + diffuser, + the barn doors narrowed down allowed me to aim very soft light right where it was needed, to just create a subtle hair light, AND light the off shoulder. Look very closely at the crown of her head, and also look at the rim light that just barely separates her shoulder from the black background. I have not retouched this image AT ALL; this is 2007...from
the era before Lightroom for me...this is the way I learned to shoot,and to light...straight out of the camera, with the light coming from "the lights", and not from layer masks, adjustment brushes, and highlight/shadow recovery...today, I would probably clone out the flyaway hairs on this, and I was NOT fond of her hairstyle, with the deliberate "in the eyes bangs" look that was so trendy that season...but if you look, this is what one softbox, one big reflector, and one light with grid + diffuser + barn doors looks like at ISO 100, and f/5.6. at 100 Watt-seconds
If you look closely at this shot on a calibrated monitor, you will see that the background has a very,very subtle gradient...it's NOT pure, jet-black from edge to edge, but behind her is a very,very subtle "halo" that's lighter in the center. That was done in-camera, by opening the right-hand side of the 2-way barn doors, and allowing some of the light to bounce off of the left flap, which was constricting the light and confining it to her head-top and shoulder, and also keeping my lens from flaring--AND,
at the same time, bouncing a little bit of light over and to the background,some eight feet behind her head. The falloff at the bottom of the frame is totally pre-vignette for me..that is the actual,natural fall-off of that softbox, and the way it was aimed and positioned. Overall, I was trying to get a really good, realistic,naturalistic, 3-D look that would look "classical" and not "trendy" or dated. No airbrushing, no post-processing tricks, just SOOC lighting with two, 100 Watt-second flashes and a reflector and what I consider essential light-shaping tools: honeycomb grids, mylar diffuser material, and 2- way or 4-way barndoors.