No they're pretty much the opposite of muddy. The contrast is borderline excessive -- you're starting to lose details in some areas, like the chair cushion in #1, and the ears in #2. Burning these areas will help bring the detail and separation back.
No they're pretty much the opposite of muddy. The contrast is borderline excessive -- you're starting to lose details in some areas, like the chair cushion in #1, and the ears in #2. Burning these areas will help bring the detail and separation back.
I agree with this, and -- in case you decide to work more on these images -- I'd like to suggest that you also burn all the white that appears out of focus in the background and lower left of the frame in #1.No they're pretty much the opposite of muddy. The contrast is borderline excessive -- you're starting to lose details in some areas, like the chair cushion in #1, and the ears in #2. Burning these areas will help bring the detail and separation back.
I agree with this, and -- in case you decide to work more on these images -- I'd like to suggest that you also burn all the white that appears out of focus in the background and lower left of the frame in #1.No they're pretty much the opposite of muddy. The contrast is borderline excessive -- you're starting to lose details in some areas, like the chair cushion in #1, and the ears in #2. Burning these areas will help bring the detail and separation back.
That seems to be one sharp lens, by the way.