I totally support the idea of learning how to do the film thing. It's very cool, a great skill to have, always valuable to understand the roots of
anything you want to do well, etc.
That being said...
I dont wanna go from Digi to Film . Im still going to shoot digi forever. I just feel its important to know about Film shooting and how its done. I also feel the fact that i wont be able to preview any of my work before its developed would help me with my exposure practice. i also, Film cams produce the best photos.
I'm not sure you will find this true. I spent some time trying to learn with my old Canon AE1 and found it INSANELY frustrating and hard to learn with. You could expose an entire roll, and not get a single good shot... you would have to write down your exact settings somewhere for each shot to have ANY hope of remembering what it was you did and be able to correlate that to whatever you got in the end.
It took real effort to make sure you got your pictures exposed and developed asap so you could have the memory fresh in your mind of what the environment was like, etc.
You also had to deal with the possibility of your exposure being dead-on but having the person printing them screw the picture up royally at time of printing, skewing your impression of your results... unless you also feel like buying a negative scanner, which I recommend, but a good one is expensive.
All this vs. 1. click, 2. look, 3. "Oh wait, not quite, let me do that again."
Again, I support what you are doing, but I strongly question that it will make learning photography easier... much to the contrary, it will likely make it much harder and a much slower process than it would with digital.
Oh, and I speak from experience on this. I started learning on an AE1, and it was a frustrating experience to the point where I eventually gave up and pretty much waited for DSLRs to become affordable, and then I learned extremely rapidly from there.