In the forest

[LightSpeed]

I could live with 2 as an abstract creation.
Different approach = artistic value.

 

[PixelRabbit]

I like the second one better! It has depth that the first one is missing. It kinda annoys me to look at it because of the "lack of focus" but the better depth and detail keeps me looking anyway and I like that.

 

[mishele]

My vote goes for the second one. :thumbup: I like how the color tones work together. Glad to see someone thinking outside the box!!

 

[ph0enix]

I personally think the ones you linked to are crap.

This just shows shows how art (especially abstract) is subjective. Those were taken by a fairly well known (worldwide) photographer Joe DiMaggio. That sort of blur is his signature style.

 

[jowensphoto]

Love the second one. The textures are lovely; it's amazing how you can see something and get a sense of what it would feel like to touch it.

 

[jowensphoto]

JOE DIMAGGIO JOANNE KALISH - DIMAGGIO COMMERCIAL, KALISH PORTRAITURE , DIMAGGIO PERSONAL, KALISH , DIMAGGIO , KALISH SENSUALITY, POSTERS, KALISH STILL LIFE

Very similar to your second. I think you did well

 

[ph0enix]

JOE DIMAGGIO JOANNE KALISH - DIMAGGIO COMMERCIAL, KALISH PORTRAITURE , DIMAGGIO PERSONAL, KALISH , DIMAGGIO , KALISH SENSUALITY, POSTERS, KALISH STILL LIFE

Very similar to your second. I think you did well

Is your link pointing to a specific photo? All I'm getting is Joe and Joanne's home page when I click it.

 

[ph0enix]

JOE DIMAGGIO JOANNE KALISH - DIMAGGIO COMMERCIAL, KALISH PORTRAITURE , DIMAGGIO PERSONAL, KALISH , DIMAGGIO , KALISH SENSUALITY, POSTERS, KALISH STILL LIFE

Very similar to your second. I think you did well

Is your link pointing to a specific photo? All I'm getting is Joe and Joanne's home page when I click it.

I think I found it under POSTERS. It's green and dark. Is that it? I don't believe I've seen that one before.

 

[ph0enix]

Just two more and I'll stop.

This just because of the cool raining sunlight effect. I'm going to try to reproduce it with better composition soon:

 

[Starskream666]

Why are people pointing out its blurry like his intentions were for it to be in focus. Dumb

 

[Dominantly]

I personally think the ones you linked to are crap.

This just shows shows how art (especially abstract) is subjective. Those were taken by a fairly well known (worldwide) photographer Joe DiMaggio. That sort of blur is his signature style.

Very subjective.I'm also not the type to give to flying ______ about who the photographer is. If I don't like something, no amount of notoriety or fame will change my opinion.The same goes for music, if an artist I like has a bad album (in my opinion anyways), then I don't buy it.

 

[e.rose]

I actually really like these.

I like the second one a little better though, because the first one seems a bit more jagged in the movement to me, but it's also the darker of the two so that actually kind of works. At least the way *I'm* looking at them.

 

[Dominantly]

Just two more and I'll stop.



This just because of the cool raining sunlight effect. I'm going to try to reproduce it with better composition soon:

This one is sick. It's got some good depth/reflections to it.