Hi Everyone,
recently i decided to finally purchase a dSLR for myself. Beeing a complete amateur when it comes to shooting pictures, as well as having no professional use in mind i decided to go for the "entry level" DSLR's.
After reading countless reviews, opinions and debates about Canon/Nikon superiority i finally decided to go with the K100D - it has great features, a nice kit lens (i plan on buying extra ones once i actually see what i need), and an unbeatable price.
However due to a series of fortunate events i now have a bit more money to spend so i started looking at the K10D. I very well know that it is better than the 100, however i wonder - will the difference be worth extra 300GBP (twice the price of k100d) for an amateur like me? Will i really benefit from the extra features, or are they only specific "extras" that certain prosumers might find useful?
Thanks in advance for any anwsers (especially the fast ones as i plan to order it today ).
recently i decided to finally purchase a dSLR for myself. Beeing a complete amateur when it comes to shooting pictures, as well as having no professional use in mind i decided to go for the "entry level" DSLR's.
After reading countless reviews, opinions and debates about Canon/Nikon superiority i finally decided to go with the K100D - it has great features, a nice kit lens (i plan on buying extra ones once i actually see what i need), and an unbeatable price.
However due to a series of fortunate events i now have a bit more money to spend so i started looking at the K10D. I very well know that it is better than the 100, however i wonder - will the difference be worth extra 300GBP (twice the price of k100d) for an amateur like me? Will i really benefit from the extra features, or are they only specific "extras" that certain prosumers might find useful?
Thanks in advance for any anwsers (especially the fast ones as i plan to order it today ).